MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405038931 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-204001

Durable Clinical Benefits with Exagamglogene Autotemcel for Severe Sickle Cell Disease

2024· article· en· W4405038931 sur OpenAlexaff
Haydar Frangoul, Franco Locatelli, Akshay Sharma, Monica Bhatia, Markus Y. Mapara, Robert I. Liem, Donna A. Wall, Lyndsay Molinari, Laurence Dedeken, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Paul Telfer, Ami J. Shah, Marina Cavazzana, Selim Corbacioglu, Michael J. Eckrich, Damiano Rondelli, Roland Meisel, Stephan Lobitz, Mariane de Montalembert, Martin H. Steinberg, Mark C. Walters, Laura Bower, Suzan Imren, Tina Liu, Weiyu Zhou, William Hobbs, Stephan A. Grupp

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDiseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) is a non-viral cell therapy that reactivates fetal hemoglobin (HbF) via ex vivo CRISPR-Cas9 editing of autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells at the erythroid-specific enhancer region of BCL11A. Exa-cel is approved as a one-time treatment for patients aged ≥12 years with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). We report long-term efficacy and safety for participants with SCD in the ongoing phase 3 CLIMB SCD-121 and CLIMB-131 studies. Methods: CLIMB SCD-121 is a 2-year, phase 3 study of a single-infusion of exa-cel in participants aged 12 through 35 years with SCD and a history of ≥2 vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs)/year for 2 years before screening. Enrollment and dosing are complete; the study is ongoing. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants free of severe VOCs for ≥12 consecutive months (VF12); the key secondary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants free from inpatient hospitalization for severe VOCs for ≥12 consecutive months (HF12). Evaluation of VF12 and HF12 began 60 days after the last red blood cell (RBC) transfusion for post-transplant support or SCD management. Participants evaluable for the primary and key secondary endpoints had ≥16 months of follow-up after exa-cel infusion. Participants who complete CLIMB-121 may enroll in the 13-year long-term extension study, CLIMB-131, where they will be followed for a total of 15 years. Results: As of May 2024, a total of 46 participants (mean age of all participants: 21.4 years, range: 12, 34; mean age of adolescents 12 through 18 years of age [N=12]: 14.5 years, range: 12, 17) with mean 4.2 VOCs/year at baseline received exa-cel after myeloablative busulfan conditioning and had a median follow-up of 29.9 months (range: 8.9, 58.9). Of these participants, 31 completed 2 years of follow-up in CLIMB SCD-121 and transitioned to CLIMB-131. After exa-cel infusion, all 46 participants engrafted neutrophils and platelets at a median of 27 days (range: 15, 40) and 34.5 days (range: 23, 126), respectively. Of the 46 participants, 40 were evaluable for the primary and key secondary endpoints of which 36 (90.0%) achieved VF12 (95% CI: 76.3%, 97.2%) and 38 (95.0%) achieved HF12 (95% CI: 83.1%, 99.4%). In participants achieving VF12, mean VOC-free duration was 29.3 months (range: 14.0, 56.3). All participants, including those who did not achieve VF12, maintained increased levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and HbF and stable allelic editing, supporting that the effects from exa-cel are durable over time in all patients. For all participants, mean total Hb was 11.9 g/dL from Month 3 and was maintained at normal or near normal levels of ≥12 g/dL from Month 6 onward; mean HbF was 37.4% at Month 3 and generally ≥40% from Month 6 onward with pancellular distribution (≥95% RBCs express HbF). Proportion of edited BCL11A alleles was stable in bone marrow CD34+ and peripheral blood nucleated cells. Clinically meaningful improvements in hemolysis markers (lactate dehydrogenase, haptoglobin, reticulocyte count, indirect bilirubin) were observed and maintained over time. Quality of life (QOL) measures showed clinically meaningful improvements compared to baseline. Most common adverse events (AEs) were nausea (69.6%), stomatitis (63%), vomiting (58.7%), febrile neutropenia (54.3%), headache (54.3%), abdominal pain (52.2%), and pruritis (50%). Most AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) occurred within first 6 months after exa-cel infusion. No participants had SAEs considered related to exa-cel; there were no study discontinuations or malignancies. As previously reported, there was 1 death from respiratory failure due to COVID-19 infection unrelated to exa-cel. Conclusion: Exa-cel demonstrated elimination of VOCs in 90% of participants that was maintained for up to 4.7 years. All participants had durable increases in Hb and HbF levels and stable allelic editing; clinically meaningful improvements were also seen in hemolysis markers and QOL measures. The safety profile of exa-cel remains consistent with myeloablative busulfan conditioning and autologous transplantation. These results confirm the potential for exa-cel to provide a one-time functional cure to patients with severe SCD.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207