MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405038931 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-204001

Durable Clinical Benefits with Exagamglogene Autotemcel for Severe Sickle Cell Disease

2024· article· en· W4405038931 on OpenAlexaff
Haydar Frangoul, Franco Locatelli, Akshay Sharma, Monica Bhatia, Markus Y. Mapara, Robert I. Liem, Donna A. Wall, Lyndsay Molinari, Laurence Dedeken, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Paul Telfer, Ami J. Shah, Marina Cavazzana, Selim Corbacioglu, Michael J. Eckrich, Damiano Rondelli, Roland Meisel, Stephan Lobitz, Mariane de Montalembert, Martin H. Steinberg, Mark C. Walters, Laura Bower, Suzan Imren, Tina Liu, Weiyu Zhou, William Hobbs, Stephan A. Grupp

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) is a non-viral cell therapy that reactivates fetal hemoglobin (HbF) via ex vivo CRISPR-Cas9 editing of autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells at the erythroid-specific enhancer region of BCL11A. Exa-cel is approved as a one-time treatment for patients aged ≥12 years with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). We report long-term efficacy and safety for participants with SCD in the ongoing phase 3 CLIMB SCD-121 and CLIMB-131 studies. Methods: CLIMB SCD-121 is a 2-year, phase 3 study of a single-infusion of exa-cel in participants aged 12 through 35 years with SCD and a history of ≥2 vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs)/year for 2 years before screening. Enrollment and dosing are complete; the study is ongoing. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants free of severe VOCs for ≥12 consecutive months (VF12); the key secondary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants free from inpatient hospitalization for severe VOCs for ≥12 consecutive months (HF12). Evaluation of VF12 and HF12 began 60 days after the last red blood cell (RBC) transfusion for post-transplant support or SCD management. Participants evaluable for the primary and key secondary endpoints had ≥16 months of follow-up after exa-cel infusion. Participants who complete CLIMB-121 may enroll in the 13-year long-term extension study, CLIMB-131, where they will be followed for a total of 15 years. Results: As of May 2024, a total of 46 participants (mean age of all participants: 21.4 years, range: 12, 34; mean age of adolescents 12 through 18 years of age [N=12]: 14.5 years, range: 12, 17) with mean 4.2 VOCs/year at baseline received exa-cel after myeloablative busulfan conditioning and had a median follow-up of 29.9 months (range: 8.9, 58.9). Of these participants, 31 completed 2 years of follow-up in CLIMB SCD-121 and transitioned to CLIMB-131. After exa-cel infusion, all 46 participants engrafted neutrophils and platelets at a median of 27 days (range: 15, 40) and 34.5 days (range: 23, 126), respectively. Of the 46 participants, 40 were evaluable for the primary and key secondary endpoints of which 36 (90.0%) achieved VF12 (95% CI: 76.3%, 97.2%) and 38 (95.0%) achieved HF12 (95% CI: 83.1%, 99.4%). In participants achieving VF12, mean VOC-free duration was 29.3 months (range: 14.0, 56.3). All participants, including those who did not achieve VF12, maintained increased levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and HbF and stable allelic editing, supporting that the effects from exa-cel are durable over time in all patients. For all participants, mean total Hb was 11.9 g/dL from Month 3 and was maintained at normal or near normal levels of ≥12 g/dL from Month 6 onward; mean HbF was 37.4% at Month 3 and generally ≥40% from Month 6 onward with pancellular distribution (≥95% RBCs express HbF). Proportion of edited BCL11A alleles was stable in bone marrow CD34+ and peripheral blood nucleated cells. Clinically meaningful improvements in hemolysis markers (lactate dehydrogenase, haptoglobin, reticulocyte count, indirect bilirubin) were observed and maintained over time. Quality of life (QOL) measures showed clinically meaningful improvements compared to baseline. Most common adverse events (AEs) were nausea (69.6%), stomatitis (63%), vomiting (58.7%), febrile neutropenia (54.3%), headache (54.3%), abdominal pain (52.2%), and pruritis (50%). Most AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) occurred within first 6 months after exa-cel infusion. No participants had SAEs considered related to exa-cel; there were no study discontinuations or malignancies. As previously reported, there was 1 death from respiratory failure due to COVID-19 infection unrelated to exa-cel. Conclusion: Exa-cel demonstrated elimination of VOCs in 90% of participants that was maintained for up to 4.7 years. All participants had durable increases in Hb and HbF levels and stable allelic editing; clinically meaningful improvements were also seen in hemolysis markers and QOL measures. The safety profile of exa-cel remains consistent with myeloablative busulfan conditioning and autologous transplantation. These results confirm the potential for exa-cel to provide a one-time functional cure to patients with severe SCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207