MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4405046554 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-194612

Subcutaneous Mosunetuzumab Leads to High Rates of Durable Responses, Low Rates of Cytokine Release Syndrome, and Non-Inferior Exposure Compared with Intravenous Administration in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Primary Analysis of a Pivotal Phase II

2024· article· en· W4405046554 sur OpenAlexaff
Nancy L. Bartlett, Laurie H. Sehn, Sarit Assouline, Pratyush Giri, John Kuruvilla, Stephen J. Schuster, Sung Soo Yoon, Keith Fay, Georg Heß, Martin Dreyling, Norma C. Gutiérrez, Eva Cybulski, Antonia Kwan, Elicia Penuel, Samuel Tracy, Denison Kuruvilla, Joseph Chen, Volker Wiebking, Michael C. Wei, Lihua E. Budde

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreJewish General HospitalSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCytokine release syndromeRefractory (planetary science)CytokineInternal medicineLymphomaGastroenterologySurgeryImmunotherapyCancerChimeric antigen receptor

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody approved by the FDA and EMA for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior lines of therapy by intravenous (IV) administration. In a Phase II study (NCT02500407), fixed-duration Mosun IV had a manageable safety profile and induced a high rate of complete responses (CRs; 60%) in patients (pts) with R/R FL (Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022). A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of Mosun, aimed at further improving safety and pt convenience, is currently under evaluation. Here we present data from the primary analysis of Mosun SC in pts with R/R FL. Methods: Eligible pts had R/R FL Grade (Gr) 1-3a and ≥2 prior therapies. Mosun was administered by a single SC injection (≤1mL over 30s-2min) in 21-day cycles with step-up dosing in Cycle (C)1 (C1 Day [D]1, 5mg; C1D8, 45mg; C1D15, 45mg; C2D1 and onwards, 45mg). Corticosteroid prophylaxis was required during C1; hospitalization was not mandatory. Pts with a CR by C8 completed treatment; those with a partial response or stable disease continued therapy for up to 17 cycles. The primary objective was pharmacokinetic non-inferiority (PKNI) of Mosun SC to Mosun IV (historical control); co-primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints were serum Ctrough(C3) and model-predicted cumulative serum AUCD0-84. Non-inferiority was defined as lower bounds of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of geometric mean ratios (GMRs) being above the pre-defined margin of 0.8. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), CR rate, duration of response (DOR) and of CR (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between Apr 2021 and Feb 2023, 94 pts were enrolled.At data cut-off (Feb 1, 2024), median time on study was 20.7 months (range: 1-34). Median age was 65 years (range: 35-84), 87% had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease, and 56% had FLIPI score ≥3 at study entry. Median number of prior therapy lines was 3 (range: 2-9); 44% had progressive disease (PD) within 24 months from start of first-line therapy; 63% and 67% were refractory to their last therapy and any prior anti-CD20 therapy, respectively; 46% were double refractory to any prior anti-CD20 therapy and alkylating agent. Median number of cycles received was 8 (range: 1-17). The PKNI analysis included 68/94 SC (only pts treated with updated drug formulation) and 90/90 IV PK-evaluable pts. The co-primary PK endpoints were met, with 90% CI lower bounds of the GMRs above 0.8 for both Ctrough(C3) (GMR 1.39 [90% CI: 1.2-1.6]) and AUCD0-84 (GMR 1.06 [90% CI: 0.9-1.2]). In the Mosun SC group (n=94), ORR and CR rate (IRC-assessed) were 74% and 59%, respectively. Estimated 18-month DOR and DOCR were 60% (95% CI: 45.8-73.3) and 66% (95% CI: 51.0-80.2), respectively. Median PFS was 18.5 months (95% CI: 12.9-24.0); median OS was not reached. Most common all-grade adverse events (AEs) were injection-site reactions (ISRs; 61%), fatigue (35%), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 30%). ISRs were all Gr 1/2 and non-serious; none led to treatment discontinuation. CRS events (Gr 1/2 28%; Gr 3 2%) were manageable; serious CRS events occurred in 15% of pts. All CRS events occurred in C1, mostly on C1D1 and C1D8; all resolved. Median time to CRS onset was 2.5 days; median duration was 2 days. Of 28 pts with CRS, 8 received tocilizumab and 6 received steroids. Suspected immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 3 pts (lethargy, n=2; memory impairment, n=1), with 2 events concurrent with CRS. All events were Gr 1, occurred during C1, and resolved without steroid use. Gr 3/4 and serious AEs were reported in 49% and 39% of pts, respectively. Mosun-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 pts. Gr 5 AEs (excluding PD) were reported in 5 pts (COVID-19 pneumonia, n=2; COVID-19, n=1; hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, n=1 [with active Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and lymphoma transformation]; general physical health deterioration, n=1). Conclusions: The study's co-primary PK endpoints were met, demonstrating non-inferior PK for Mosun SC vs Mosun IV. Fixed-duration Mosun SC achieved high rates of deep and durable responses in pts with R/R FL and ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The safety profile was manageable, with low CRS incidence and severity. Mosun SC potentially enhances pt convenience and practice efficiency, and can be delivered in an outpatient setting.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→