MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405046554 · doi:10.1182/blood-2024-194612

Subcutaneous Mosunetuzumab Leads to High Rates of Durable Responses, Low Rates of Cytokine Release Syndrome, and Non-Inferior Exposure Compared with Intravenous Administration in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Primary Analysis of a Pivotal Phase II

2024· article· en· W4405046554 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy L. Bartlett, Laurie H. Sehn, Sarit Assouline, Pratyush Giri, John Kuruvilla, Stephen J. Schuster, Sung Soo Yoon, Keith Fay, Georg Heß, Martin Dreyling, Norma C. Gutiérrez, Eva Cybulski, Antonia Kwan, Elicia Penuel, Samuel Tracy, Denison Kuruvilla, Joseph Chen, Volker Wiebking, Michael C. Wei, Lihua E. Budde

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreJewish General HospitalSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCytokine release syndromeRefractory (planetary science)CytokineInternal medicineLymphomaGastroenterologySurgeryImmunotherapyCancerChimeric antigen receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody approved by the FDA and EMA for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior lines of therapy by intravenous (IV) administration. In a Phase II study (NCT02500407), fixed-duration Mosun IV had a manageable safety profile and induced a high rate of complete responses (CRs; 60%) in patients (pts) with R/R FL (Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022). A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of Mosun, aimed at further improving safety and pt convenience, is currently under evaluation. Here we present data from the primary analysis of Mosun SC in pts with R/R FL. Methods: Eligible pts had R/R FL Grade (Gr) 1-3a and ≥2 prior therapies. Mosun was administered by a single SC injection (≤1mL over 30s-2min) in 21-day cycles with step-up dosing in Cycle (C)1 (C1 Day [D]1, 5mg; C1D8, 45mg; C1D15, 45mg; C2D1 and onwards, 45mg). Corticosteroid prophylaxis was required during C1; hospitalization was not mandatory. Pts with a CR by C8 completed treatment; those with a partial response or stable disease continued therapy for up to 17 cycles. The primary objective was pharmacokinetic non-inferiority (PKNI) of Mosun SC to Mosun IV (historical control); co-primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints were serum Ctrough(C3) and model-predicted cumulative serum AUCD0-84. Non-inferiority was defined as lower bounds of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of geometric mean ratios (GMRs) being above the pre-defined margin of 0.8. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), CR rate, duration of response (DOR) and of CR (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between Apr 2021 and Feb 2023, 94 pts were enrolled.At data cut-off (Feb 1, 2024), median time on study was 20.7 months (range: 1-34). Median age was 65 years (range: 35-84), 87% had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease, and 56% had FLIPI score ≥3 at study entry. Median number of prior therapy lines was 3 (range: 2-9); 44% had progressive disease (PD) within 24 months from start of first-line therapy; 63% and 67% were refractory to their last therapy and any prior anti-CD20 therapy, respectively; 46% were double refractory to any prior anti-CD20 therapy and alkylating agent. Median number of cycles received was 8 (range: 1-17). The PKNI analysis included 68/94 SC (only pts treated with updated drug formulation) and 90/90 IV PK-evaluable pts. The co-primary PK endpoints were met, with 90% CI lower bounds of the GMRs above 0.8 for both Ctrough(C3) (GMR 1.39 [90% CI: 1.2-1.6]) and AUCD0-84 (GMR 1.06 [90% CI: 0.9-1.2]). In the Mosun SC group (n=94), ORR and CR rate (IRC-assessed) were 74% and 59%, respectively. Estimated 18-month DOR and DOCR were 60% (95% CI: 45.8-73.3) and 66% (95% CI: 51.0-80.2), respectively. Median PFS was 18.5 months (95% CI: 12.9-24.0); median OS was not reached. Most common all-grade adverse events (AEs) were injection-site reactions (ISRs; 61%), fatigue (35%), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 30%). ISRs were all Gr 1/2 and non-serious; none led to treatment discontinuation. CRS events (Gr 1/2 28%; Gr 3 2%) were manageable; serious CRS events occurred in 15% of pts. All CRS events occurred in C1, mostly on C1D1 and C1D8; all resolved. Median time to CRS onset was 2.5 days; median duration was 2 days. Of 28 pts with CRS, 8 received tocilizumab and 6 received steroids. Suspected immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 3 pts (lethargy, n=2; memory impairment, n=1), with 2 events concurrent with CRS. All events were Gr 1, occurred during C1, and resolved without steroid use. Gr 3/4 and serious AEs were reported in 49% and 39% of pts, respectively. Mosun-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 pts. Gr 5 AEs (excluding PD) were reported in 5 pts (COVID-19 pneumonia, n=2; COVID-19, n=1; hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, n=1 [with active Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and lymphoma transformation]; general physical health deterioration, n=1). Conclusions: The study's co-primary PK endpoints were met, demonstrating non-inferior PK for Mosun SC vs Mosun IV. Fixed-duration Mosun SC achieved high rates of deep and durable responses in pts with R/R FL and ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The safety profile was manageable, with low CRS incidence and severity. Mosun SC potentially enhances pt convenience and practice efficiency, and can be delivered in an outpatient setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→