DEVELOPMENT OF A QUANTITATIVE SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY (QSP) MODEL FOR SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE) FOR THERAPEUTIC EVALUATION IN A VIRTUAL POPULATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PV261 / #833 Poster Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment Background/Purpose Despite numerous recent clinical trials, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has an unmet need with only 2 approved biologics, while other autoimmune conditions have seen an explosion in approvals of targeted therapies. As such, the complex pathogenesis of SLE warrants ongoing efforts for novel therapeutic investigation and mechanistic insights. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling is becoming an integral tool of drug development through combining physiologic, mechanistic disease models with therapeutic exposure-response relationships. By generating a mathematical representation of molecular and cellular mechanisms in a disease, QSP can evaluate therapeutic effects and provide insight into linking clinical endpoints to optimal biological network targets, clinical trial design, and dosing strategies. A QSP model was developed to characterize clinical endpoint data, assess dosing strategies, and compare mechanism of action contribution to disease pathophysiology for a suite of therapies in moderate to severe SLE, including B cell Activating Factor (BAFF) inhibitors, type I interferon (IFN) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors, and standards of care. In this study, 2 IFN biologics: anifrolumab, acting upon the IFN receptor, and sifalimumab, acting upon IFN-α, are compared to assess model performance. Methods An ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based QSP model for SLE was constructed to describe the interplay of cells and biomolecules, tissue-level phenomena, and clinical endpoints. These interactions were modeled using literature-reported and internal information from in vitro/ex vivo assay. SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI4), Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI), and swollen joint count (SJC) clinical endpoints are included to support clinical evaluation. Thales, a QSP modeling platform designed to streamline optimization of virtual patient populations (SimPops), was utilized to calibrate the model to 45 clinical trials and 29 treatment arms simultaneously, thereby capturing the variability of patients representing a broader SLE population. Anifrolumab trials were included in the model calibration data, while sifalimumab trials were withheld to be used only for model validation. Model assessment was evaluated by quantifying percentage of datapoints that fell within model confidence intervals. Results The model’s calibrated SimPops captures SRI4, CLASI, and SJC profiles within 95% CIs across the various dosing levels of anifrolumab in the training dataset and successfully predicted sifalimumab drug effects in the validation dataset. Notably, the model reproduces clinical endpoint profiles for the trial placebo groups despite differing baseline patient characteristics and tapering protocols across the anifrolumab and sifalimumab trials. Furthermore, the model exhibits a greater SRI4 response at week 52 for anifrolumab when compared to sifalimumab, in agreement with the anifrolumab ( NCT01438489 ) and sifalimumab ( NCT01283139 ) trials. The difference in patient improvement may be attributable to the broader, systemic effects of targeting the IFN receptor as opposed to the IFN-α cytokine alone. Conclusions An SLE QSP model was successfully developed and optimized a SimPops that accurately captures clinical endpoint data for 2 IFN biologics. The Thales platform and QSP model framework allows for efficient addition of clinical trials, biological mechanisms, and therapeutics as new data becomes available, allowing for more robust predictions of novel therapeutics and combinations. Further, key determinants of individual patient response can be explored to identify patient subgroups that are best suited for specific therapies. Overall, the continuously evolving QSP model can serve as a foundation for SLE therapeutic development by providing a mechanistic understanding of SLE.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».