MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

DEVELOPMENT OF A QUANTITATIVE SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY (QSP) MODEL FOR SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE) FOR THERAPEUTIC EVALUATION IN A VIRTUAL POPULATION

2025· article· en· W4410513121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francisco J. Huizar, Marı́a Jesús Muñoz, Noah Brostoff, Anjali Mittal, Patrick Coit, Kathleen Morgan-Kehr, John Bartels, Nicole M. Parish, Jeff Woodhead, Ryan Suderman, Steve W. C. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLupus erythematosusPopulationPharmacologyIntensive care medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV261 / #833 Poster Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment Background/Purpose Despite numerous recent clinical trials, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has an unmet need with only 2 approved biologics, while other autoimmune conditions have seen an explosion in approvals of targeted therapies. As such, the complex pathogenesis of SLE warrants ongoing efforts for novel therapeutic investigation and mechanistic insights. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling is becoming an integral tool of drug development through combining physiologic, mechanistic disease models with therapeutic exposure-response relationships. By generating a mathematical representation of molecular and cellular mechanisms in a disease, QSP can evaluate therapeutic effects and provide insight into linking clinical endpoints to optimal biological network targets, clinical trial design, and dosing strategies. A QSP model was developed to characterize clinical endpoint data, assess dosing strategies, and compare mechanism of action contribution to disease pathophysiology for a suite of therapies in moderate to severe SLE, including B cell Activating Factor (BAFF) inhibitors, type I interferon (IFN) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors, and standards of care. In this study, 2 IFN biologics: anifrolumab, acting upon the IFN receptor, and sifalimumab, acting upon IFN-α, are compared to assess model performance. Methods An ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based QSP model for SLE was constructed to describe the interplay of cells and biomolecules, tissue-level phenomena, and clinical endpoints. These interactions were modeled using literature-reported and internal information from in vitro/ex vivo assay. SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI4), Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI), and swollen joint count (SJC) clinical endpoints are included to support clinical evaluation. Thales, a QSP modeling platform designed to streamline optimization of virtual patient populations (SimPops), was utilized to calibrate the model to 45 clinical trials and 29 treatment arms simultaneously, thereby capturing the variability of patients representing a broader SLE population. Anifrolumab trials were included in the model calibration data, while sifalimumab trials were withheld to be used only for model validation. Model assessment was evaluated by quantifying percentage of datapoints that fell within model confidence intervals. Results The model’s calibrated SimPops captures SRI4, CLASI, and SJC profiles within 95% CIs across the various dosing levels of anifrolumab in the training dataset and successfully predicted sifalimumab drug effects in the validation dataset. Notably, the model reproduces clinical endpoint profiles for the trial placebo groups despite differing baseline patient characteristics and tapering protocols across the anifrolumab and sifalimumab trials. Furthermore, the model exhibits a greater SRI4 response at week 52 for anifrolumab when compared to sifalimumab, in agreement with the anifrolumab ( NCT01438489 ) and sifalimumab ( NCT01283139 ) trials. The difference in patient improvement may be attributable to the broader, systemic effects of targeting the IFN receptor as opposed to the IFN-α cytokine alone. Conclusions An SLE QSP model was successfully developed and optimized a SimPops that accurately captures clinical endpoint data for 2 IFN biologics. The Thales platform and QSP model framework allows for efficient addition of clinical trials, biological mechanisms, and therapeutics as new data becomes available, allowing for more robust predictions of novel therapeutics and combinations. Further, key determinants of individual patient response can be explored to identify patient subgroups that are best suited for specific therapies. Overall, the continuously evolving QSP model can serve as a foundation for SLE therapeutic development by providing a mechanistic understanding of SLE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→