Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Across All Skin Tones
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Data and educational gaps in populations with skin of color contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in psoriasis treatment. Cohort A of the VISIBLE study includes participants with psoriasis who self-identify as belonging to a racial or ethnic category other than White, across the entire skin-tone spectrum. Objective: To evaluate efficacy, quality of life, and adverse event outcomes among participants with moderate to severe psoriasis and skin of color who received guselkumab, 100 mg, for up to 48 weeks. Design, Setting, and Participants: This ongoing phase 3b, randomized clinical trial at 39 sites in the US and Canada enrolled adults with skin of color and moderate to severe psoriasis (body surface area [BSA] ≥10%; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥12; Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] ≥3). Data were collected from August 2022 to June 2024. Interventions: Randomized participants (3:1) received guselkumab, 100 mg, at weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks, or placebo with crossover to guselkumab at weeks 16 and 20, then every 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary end points were IGA score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) and PASI improvement of 90% or more (PASI 90) at week 16 (guselkumab vs placebo). Major secondary end points included IGA 0; PASI 100; percentage changes from baseline in PASI and BSA; changes from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) symptoms; and at least a 4-point reduction in PSSD itch. Results: Of 103 participants (77 randomized to guselkumab; 26 randomized to placebo), 94 (91.3%) completed 48 weeks of treatment. The mean (SD) age overall was 44.1 (12.9) years, and 74 participants (71.8%) were male. At week 16, coprimary end points were achieved by greater proportions of guselkumab- vs placebo-treated participants (IGA 0/1: 57 of 77 [74.0%] vs 0 of 26; P < .001; PASI 90: 44 of 77 [57.1%] vs 1 of 26 [3.8%]; P < .001); 25 of 77 (32.5%) vs 0 of 26 achieved IGA 0 (P < .001), and 23 of 77 (29.9%) vs 0 of 26 achieved PASI 100 (P = .002). DLQI and PSSD symptoms score least-squares mean changes from baseline were -12.1 (95% CI, -13.1 to -10.9) vs -2.5 (95% CI, -4.4 to -0.6) (P < .001), and -49.4 (95% CI, -54.0 to -44.9) vs -8.2 (95% CI, -15.8 to -0.6) (P < .001), respectively. A 4-point or greater reduction in PSSD itch score was achieved by 48 (66.7%) vs 4 (16.7%) participants with a baseline score of at least 4 (P < .001). Efficacy increased and was maintained through week 48, with guselkumab-randomized participants achieving mean percentage improvements in PASI and BSA of more than 94%, and more than 50% of participants achieving complete clearance. Infections were the most common adverse events in the guselkumab (16 [20.8%]) and placebo (3 [11.5%]) groups through week 16, predominantly upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, after 3 doses of guselkumab, significant skin clearance and quality of life improvements were observed in this cohort of participants with moderate to severe psoriasis and skin of color across the range of objectively measured skin tones. Improvements increased and were maintained through week 48. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05272150.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».