Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Across All Skin Tones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Data and educational gaps in populations with skin of color contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in psoriasis treatment. Cohort A of the VISIBLE study includes participants with psoriasis who self-identify as belonging to a racial or ethnic category other than White, across the entire skin-tone spectrum. Objective: To evaluate efficacy, quality of life, and adverse event outcomes among participants with moderate to severe psoriasis and skin of color who received guselkumab, 100 mg, for up to 48 weeks. Design, Setting, and Participants: This ongoing phase 3b, randomized clinical trial at 39 sites in the US and Canada enrolled adults with skin of color and moderate to severe psoriasis (body surface area [BSA] ≥10%; Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥12; Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] ≥3). Data were collected from August 2022 to June 2024. Interventions: Randomized participants (3:1) received guselkumab, 100 mg, at weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks, or placebo with crossover to guselkumab at weeks 16 and 20, then every 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary end points were IGA score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) and PASI improvement of 90% or more (PASI 90) at week 16 (guselkumab vs placebo). Major secondary end points included IGA 0; PASI 100; percentage changes from baseline in PASI and BSA; changes from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) symptoms; and at least a 4-point reduction in PSSD itch. Results: Of 103 participants (77 randomized to guselkumab; 26 randomized to placebo), 94 (91.3%) completed 48 weeks of treatment. The mean (SD) age overall was 44.1 (12.9) years, and 74 participants (71.8%) were male. At week 16, coprimary end points were achieved by greater proportions of guselkumab- vs placebo-treated participants (IGA 0/1: 57 of 77 [74.0%] vs 0 of 26; P < .001; PASI 90: 44 of 77 [57.1%] vs 1 of 26 [3.8%]; P < .001); 25 of 77 (32.5%) vs 0 of 26 achieved IGA 0 (P < .001), and 23 of 77 (29.9%) vs 0 of 26 achieved PASI 100 (P = .002). DLQI and PSSD symptoms score least-squares mean changes from baseline were -12.1 (95% CI, -13.1 to -10.9) vs -2.5 (95% CI, -4.4 to -0.6) (P < .001), and -49.4 (95% CI, -54.0 to -44.9) vs -8.2 (95% CI, -15.8 to -0.6) (P < .001), respectively. A 4-point or greater reduction in PSSD itch score was achieved by 48 (66.7%) vs 4 (16.7%) participants with a baseline score of at least 4 (P < .001). Efficacy increased and was maintained through week 48, with guselkumab-randomized participants achieving mean percentage improvements in PASI and BSA of more than 94%, and more than 50% of participants achieving complete clearance. Infections were the most common adverse events in the guselkumab (16 [20.8%]) and placebo (3 [11.5%]) groups through week 16, predominantly upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, after 3 doses of guselkumab, significant skin clearance and quality of life improvements were observed in this cohort of participants with moderate to severe psoriasis and skin of color across the range of objectively measured skin tones. Improvements increased and were maintained through week 48. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05272150.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it