Abstract A019: Precision radiotherapy for incurable brain tumors: Phase 1b dose & regimen optimization study of iopofosine I 131 in inoperable relapsed or refractory pediatric high-grade glioma, interim data assessment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Iopofosine I 131, a radioconjugate therapy targeting tumor lipid rafts, is being assessed in CLOVER-2–an ongoing dose-finding study in children, adolescents, and young adults with malignant brain tumors. Part A [NCT03478462] was a dose escalation phase enrolling patients (pts) aged 2-25 years (yrs) with measurable solid tumors, lymphomas or malignant brain tumors. Pts received either a single dose (15-30 mCi/m2) on Day 1 or fractionated dose (total dose 45-75 mCi/m2) on Days 1 and 15 in a 12-week Cycle; an additional cycle was allowed at investigator discretion. Part B [NCT05610891] is an expansion in pts with high grade glioma (HGG) or ependymoma to evaluate 2 dosing regimens. Arm 1pts receive 2 doses of 20 mCi/m2 given 14 days apart (± 1 day) for 2 cycles. Arm 2 pts receive 2 doses of 10 mCi/m2 14 days apart for 3 cycles. Pts in either Arm are eligible for 1 additional cycle at the investigator's discretion. Major entry criteria include pts aged 10-25 yrs, ≥1 measurable intracranial lesion (≥10mm), and PS ≥60. A total of 14 pts with brain malignancies have been enrolled, including 6 with ependymoma, 4 with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, and 1 each with diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG), diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma, and glioblastoma multiforme. The median age is 13 yrs (range 5-25 yrs) and includes 9 males and 5 females with a mean of 4.4 prior interventions. Seven pts received at least 55 mCi total administered dose (TAD) of whom 6 are efficacy-evaluable; 7 received < 55 mCi of whom 5 are evaluable; 3 received only a single cycle and were considered unevaluable. There were 2 minor responses reported; both in pts who received ≥ 55 mCi. One pt with DHG experienced an initial 35% reduction in target lesions and a continued reduction to 50%at 8 months post-treatment but a new lesion was noted at the same time. A second pt with ependymoma experienced a 31% reduction in the target lesion. All pts who received at least 55 mCi TAD reported stable disease resulting in a 100% disease control rate with an average duration of 5.4 months (range 1.9-11.0 months). The mean progression free survival (PFS) in pts who received ≥ 55 mCi (n=6) was 5.9 months (range 2.1-11.2) and mean overall survival (OS) of 8.1 months (range 4.9 to 14.9 months). Importantly Part B pts (n=3) achieving a minimum of 55 mCi and receiving multiple cycles demonstrated PFS of 8.1 months with OS ongoing (median follow up 11.5 months, range 4.9-14.9 months). In comparison, for pts who received < 55 mCi (n=5) the mean PFS was 1.8 months (range 1.2-2.8). The safety profile was consistent with selective targeting of tumor sites with clinically negligible off-target effect outside the hematologic system. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (AE) are: thrombocytopenia (79%), anemia (64%), neutropenia (64%), and white blood cell count decreased (64%). The hematologic AEs are similar to those seen in other pts treated with iopofosine I 131 and are considered predictable and manageable. Enrollment in the Part B expansion for pts with HGG or ependymoma is ongoing. Citation Format: Sameer Farouk Sait, Jennifer H Foster, Daniel A Morgenstern, Scott Raskin, Laura Klesse, Julia Glade-Bender, Kate Oliver, Jarrod Longcor, Nicholas Pytel. Precision radiotherapy for incurable brain tumors: Phase 1b dose & regimen optimization study of iopofosine I 131 in inoperable relapsed or refractory pediatric high-grade glioma, interim data assessment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Discovery and Innovation in Pediatric Cancer— From Biology to Breakthrough Therapies; 2025 Sep 25-28; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_2):Abstract nr A019.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».