Abstract A019: Precision radiotherapy for incurable brain tumors: Phase 1b dose & regimen optimization study of iopofosine I 131 in inoperable relapsed or refractory pediatric high-grade glioma, interim data assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Iopofosine I 131, a radioconjugate therapy targeting tumor lipid rafts, is being assessed in CLOVER-2–an ongoing dose-finding study in children, adolescents, and young adults with malignant brain tumors. Part A [NCT03478462] was a dose escalation phase enrolling patients (pts) aged 2-25 years (yrs) with measurable solid tumors, lymphomas or malignant brain tumors. Pts received either a single dose (15-30 mCi/m2) on Day 1 or fractionated dose (total dose 45-75 mCi/m2) on Days 1 and 15 in a 12-week Cycle; an additional cycle was allowed at investigator discretion. Part B [NCT05610891] is an expansion in pts with high grade glioma (HGG) or ependymoma to evaluate 2 dosing regimens. Arm 1pts receive 2 doses of 20 mCi/m2 given 14 days apart (± 1 day) for 2 cycles. Arm 2 pts receive 2 doses of 10 mCi/m2 14 days apart for 3 cycles. Pts in either Arm are eligible for 1 additional cycle at the investigator's discretion. Major entry criteria include pts aged 10-25 yrs, ≥1 measurable intracranial lesion (≥10mm), and PS ≥60. A total of 14 pts with brain malignancies have been enrolled, including 6 with ependymoma, 4 with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, and 1 each with diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG), diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma, and glioblastoma multiforme. The median age is 13 yrs (range 5-25 yrs) and includes 9 males and 5 females with a mean of 4.4 prior interventions. Seven pts received at least 55 mCi total administered dose (TAD) of whom 6 are efficacy-evaluable; 7 received < 55 mCi of whom 5 are evaluable; 3 received only a single cycle and were considered unevaluable. There were 2 minor responses reported; both in pts who received ≥ 55 mCi. One pt with DHG experienced an initial 35% reduction in target lesions and a continued reduction to 50%at 8 months post-treatment but a new lesion was noted at the same time. A second pt with ependymoma experienced a 31% reduction in the target lesion. All pts who received at least 55 mCi TAD reported stable disease resulting in a 100% disease control rate with an average duration of 5.4 months (range 1.9-11.0 months). The mean progression free survival (PFS) in pts who received ≥ 55 mCi (n=6) was 5.9 months (range 2.1-11.2) and mean overall survival (OS) of 8.1 months (range 4.9 to 14.9 months). Importantly Part B pts (n=3) achieving a minimum of 55 mCi and receiving multiple cycles demonstrated PFS of 8.1 months with OS ongoing (median follow up 11.5 months, range 4.9-14.9 months). In comparison, for pts who received < 55 mCi (n=5) the mean PFS was 1.8 months (range 1.2-2.8). The safety profile was consistent with selective targeting of tumor sites with clinically negligible off-target effect outside the hematologic system. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (AE) are: thrombocytopenia (79%), anemia (64%), neutropenia (64%), and white blood cell count decreased (64%). The hematologic AEs are similar to those seen in other pts treated with iopofosine I 131 and are considered predictable and manageable. Enrollment in the Part B expansion for pts with HGG or ependymoma is ongoing. Citation Format: Sameer Farouk Sait, Jennifer H Foster, Daniel A Morgenstern, Scott Raskin, Laura Klesse, Julia Glade-Bender, Kate Oliver, Jarrod Longcor, Nicholas Pytel. Precision radiotherapy for incurable brain tumors: Phase 1b dose & regimen optimization study of iopofosine I 131 in inoperable relapsed or refractory pediatric high-grade glioma, interim data assessment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Discovery and Innovation in Pediatric Cancer— From Biology to Breakthrough Therapies; 2025 Sep 25-28; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl_2):Abstract nr A019.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".