MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W655017083 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.3197.3197

Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in an Open-Label, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Expanded-Access Study in Patients with Myelofibrosis (MF): An 1144-Patient Update

2014· article· en· W655017083 sur OpenAlexaff
Bruno Martino, Philipp le Coutre, Martin Grießhammer, Thomas Illmer, Rudolf Schlag, Cornelius F. Waller, Anna Marina Liberati, Philippe Schafhausen, Renato Tavares Daher, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Pilar Giraldo, Lynda Foltz, Pia Raanani, Vikas Gupta, Bayane Tannir, Julian Perez Ronco, Jaggannath Ghosh, Haifa Kathrin Al‐Ali

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRuxolitinibMedicineMyelofibrosisInternal medicineClinical endpointTolerabilityDiscontinuationClinical trialPhases of clinical researchPlaceboSurgeryAdverse effectBone marrowPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated reductions in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms, as well as improved survival, in patients with MF and has proved superior to placebo and best available therapy in the 2 phase 3 COMFORT studies. JUMP (JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients) is a phase 3b, expanded-access trial for countries with no access to ruxolitinib outside a clinical trial and was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with MF. As of 03 June 2014, 2027 patients have been enrolled in 25 countries, with a planned enrollment of 2500 patients. METHODS Eligible patients had MF classified as high risk, intermediate (Int)-2 risk, or Int-1 risk, with a palpable spleen (≥ 5 cm from the costal margin). Patients received starting doses of ruxolitinib based on platelet counts at baseline (5 mg twice daily [bid; ≥ 50 to < 100 × 109/L], 15 mg bid [100 to 200 × 109/L], or 20 mg bid [> 200 × 109/L]). The primary endpoint was assessment of safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib. Additional analyses included changes in palpable spleen length and symptom scores as measured by the FACT-Lymphoma Total Score (FACT-Lym TS). The final analysis will be performed after all patients have completed 24 months of treatment or ended treatment due to commercial availability. RESULTS This analysis includes results for 1144 enrolled patients (primary MF, 58.8%; n = 673) who started treatment ≥ 1 year before the data cutoff date (01 Jan 2014). At baseline, median age was 68 y (range, 18-89 y); 46.7% were female; median palpable spleen length was 13 cm below the costal margin; median hemoglobin was 105 g/L (range, 44-200 g/L) and 40.3% of patients had hemoglobin levels ˂ 100 g/L; median platelet level was 256 × 109/L (75-1910 × 109/L); mean FACT-Lym TS was 41.9. Most patients (69%) remained on treatment (35.5%) or completed treatment per protocol (33.5%; transition to commercial drug). Primary reasons for discontinuation included adverse events (AEs; 13.8%), disease progression (7.1%), and death (3.8%). Median exposure was 11.1 months; the median average daily dose was 37.2 mg for patients starting at 20 mg bid (64%; n = 728) and 23.4 mg for patients starting at 15 mg bid (33%; n = 374). The majority of patients (75.7%) had dose increases/decreases and 23.9% had a dose interruption. The most common hematologic grade ≥ 3 AEs were anemia (33.0%), thrombocytopenia (12.5%), and neutropenia (3.9%), which led to discontinuation in 2.6%, 3.2%, and 0.3% of patients, respectively. Mean hemoglobin levels declined from baseline (108 g/L) to a nadir of 85 g/L at 8 to 12 weeks and increased to near-baseline levels after week 12; mean platelet levels decreased from baseline (318 × 109/L) to a nadir of 139 × 109/L and remained stable over time. The most common nonhematologic AEs (≥ 10%) were diarrhea (14.5%), pyrexia (13.3%), fatigue (12.9%), and asthenia (12.5%) and were primarily grade 1/2; grade ≥ 3 AEs were low overall (< 2%), except pneumonia (3.6%), which led to discontinuation in 6 patients (0.5%). Serious AEs were reported for 32.3% of patients. Rates of infections were low; all-grade infections ≥ 5% included nasopharyngitis (6.3%), urinary tract infection (6.0%), and pneumonia (5.3%). Tuberculosis was reported for 3 patients (0.3%; no grade 3/4); no hepatitis B was reported. At weeks 24 and 48, 55% (431/782) and 61% (301/497) of patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in palpable spleen length, respectively; 23% (181/782) and 18% (88/497) had 25% to 50% reductions. Most patients (69%; 733/1062) experienced a ≥ 50% reduction in spleen length from baseline at any time (Figure). Clinically significant improvements on the FACT-Lym TS were seen as early as week 4 and were maintained at week 48 (mean change from baseline: week 4, 11.0; week 48, 9.4; the range for the minimally important difference is 6.5 to 11.2 points). CONCLUSIONS The JUMP study includes the largest cohort of MF patients treated with ruxolitinib reported to date. Consistent with previous reports, the most common AEs were anemia and thrombocytopenia; however, they rarely led to discontinuation. As observed previously, the majority of patients experienced reductions in spleen length and clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed with ruxolitinib treatment. Overall, the safety and efficacy profile of ruxolitinib in JUMP is consistent with that in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria. Griesshammer:Shire: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Schafhausen:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vannucchi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Foltz:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Tannir:Novartis: Employment. Ronco:Novartis: Employment. Ghosh:Novartis: Employment. Al-Ali:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,279 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207