MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in an Open-Label, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Expanded-Access Study in Patients with Myelofibrosis (MF): An 1144-Patient Update

2014· article· en· W655017083 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Martino, Philipp le Coutre, Martin Grießhammer, Thomas Illmer, Rudolf Schlag, Cornelius F. Waller, Anna Marina Liberati, Philippe Schafhausen, Renato Tavares Daher, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Pilar Giraldo, Lynda Foltz, Pia Raanani, Vikas Gupta, Bayane Tannir, Julian Perez Ronco, Jaggannath Ghosh, Haifa Kathrin Al‐Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuxolitinibMedicineMyelofibrosisInternal medicineClinical endpointTolerabilityDiscontinuationClinical trialPhases of clinical researchPlaceboSurgeryAdverse effectBone marrowPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated reductions in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms, as well as improved survival, in patients with MF and has proved superior to placebo and best available therapy in the 2 phase 3 COMFORT studies. JUMP (JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients) is a phase 3b, expanded-access trial for countries with no access to ruxolitinib outside a clinical trial and was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with MF. As of 03 June 2014, 2027 patients have been enrolled in 25 countries, with a planned enrollment of 2500 patients. METHODS Eligible patients had MF classified as high risk, intermediate (Int)-2 risk, or Int-1 risk, with a palpable spleen (≥ 5 cm from the costal margin). Patients received starting doses of ruxolitinib based on platelet counts at baseline (5 mg twice daily [bid; ≥ 50 to < 100 × 109/L], 15 mg bid [100 to 200 × 109/L], or 20 mg bid [> 200 × 109/L]). The primary endpoint was assessment of safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib. Additional analyses included changes in palpable spleen length and symptom scores as measured by the FACT-Lymphoma Total Score (FACT-Lym TS). The final analysis will be performed after all patients have completed 24 months of treatment or ended treatment due to commercial availability. RESULTS This analysis includes results for 1144 enrolled patients (primary MF, 58.8%; n = 673) who started treatment ≥ 1 year before the data cutoff date (01 Jan 2014). At baseline, median age was 68 y (range, 18-89 y); 46.7% were female; median palpable spleen length was 13 cm below the costal margin; median hemoglobin was 105 g/L (range, 44-200 g/L) and 40.3% of patients had hemoglobin levels ˂ 100 g/L; median platelet level was 256 × 109/L (75-1910 × 109/L); mean FACT-Lym TS was 41.9. Most patients (69%) remained on treatment (35.5%) or completed treatment per protocol (33.5%; transition to commercial drug). Primary reasons for discontinuation included adverse events (AEs; 13.8%), disease progression (7.1%), and death (3.8%). Median exposure was 11.1 months; the median average daily dose was 37.2 mg for patients starting at 20 mg bid (64%; n = 728) and 23.4 mg for patients starting at 15 mg bid (33%; n = 374). The majority of patients (75.7%) had dose increases/decreases and 23.9% had a dose interruption. The most common hematologic grade ≥ 3 AEs were anemia (33.0%), thrombocytopenia (12.5%), and neutropenia (3.9%), which led to discontinuation in 2.6%, 3.2%, and 0.3% of patients, respectively. Mean hemoglobin levels declined from baseline (108 g/L) to a nadir of 85 g/L at 8 to 12 weeks and increased to near-baseline levels after week 12; mean platelet levels decreased from baseline (318 × 109/L) to a nadir of 139 × 109/L and remained stable over time. The most common nonhematologic AEs (≥ 10%) were diarrhea (14.5%), pyrexia (13.3%), fatigue (12.9%), and asthenia (12.5%) and were primarily grade 1/2; grade ≥ 3 AEs were low overall (< 2%), except pneumonia (3.6%), which led to discontinuation in 6 patients (0.5%). Serious AEs were reported for 32.3% of patients. Rates of infections were low; all-grade infections ≥ 5% included nasopharyngitis (6.3%), urinary tract infection (6.0%), and pneumonia (5.3%). Tuberculosis was reported for 3 patients (0.3%; no grade 3/4); no hepatitis B was reported. At weeks 24 and 48, 55% (431/782) and 61% (301/497) of patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in palpable spleen length, respectively; 23% (181/782) and 18% (88/497) had 25% to 50% reductions. Most patients (69%; 733/1062) experienced a ≥ 50% reduction in spleen length from baseline at any time (Figure). Clinically significant improvements on the FACT-Lym TS were seen as early as week 4 and were maintained at week 48 (mean change from baseline: week 4, 11.0; week 48, 9.4; the range for the minimally important difference is 6.5 to 11.2 points). CONCLUSIONS The JUMP study includes the largest cohort of MF patients treated with ruxolitinib reported to date. Consistent with previous reports, the most common AEs were anemia and thrombocytopenia; however, they rarely led to discontinuation. As observed previously, the majority of patients experienced reductions in spleen length and clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed with ruxolitinib treatment. Overall, the safety and efficacy profile of ruxolitinib in JUMP is consistent with that in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria. Griesshammer:Shire: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Schafhausen:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vannucchi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Foltz:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Tannir:Novartis: Employment. Ronco:Novartis: Employment. Ghosh:Novartis: Employment. Al-Ali:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207