D101 is critical for the function of AttJ, a repressor of quorum quenching system in Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quorum quenching system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is specifically activated upon entering the stationary phase. Evidence has shown that this system includes two key components: the IclR-type transcriptional factor AttJ (also named as BlcR) and the AHL-lactonase AttM (also named as BlcC). At exponential phase, AttJ binds to the promoter region of attM and thus suppresses the expression of attM. At stationary phase, however, the small molecule SSA directly binds to AttJ and relieves its inhibition of AttJ and thereby triggers the expression of attM. While the regulation of AttM has been extensively investigated, little is known about the regulation of AttJ. In this study, we demonstrated the D101 amino acid of AttJ is essential for the AttJ function. In vitro, the variant protein of AttJD101H appeared to be readily aggregated. In vivo, the D101H mutation in AttJ entirely abolished the inhibitory activity of AttJ and overexpressed attM in A. tumefaciens A6. In addition, D101H mutation led to an overexpression of attJ, indicating an auto-regulatory mechanism for the attJ regulation. Put together, these findings demonstrate that D101 is an important amino acid for the transcription activity of AttJ and the transcription of attJ is regulated by a negative feedback loop. These results expand previous biochemical characterization of AttJ and provide new mechanistic insights into the regulation of quorum quenching in A. tumefaciens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".