MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1481950324 · doi:10.1038/ncomms8075

Degradation of Ndd1 by APC/CCdh1 generates a feed forward loop that times mitotic protein accumulation

2015· article· en· W1481950324 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Julia Sajman, Drora Zenvirth, Mor Nitzan, Hanah Margalit, Kobi J. Simpson-Lavy, Yuval Reiss, Itamar Cohen, Tommer Ravid, Michael Brandeis

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science FoundationIsrael Cancer Research Fund
KeywordsCDH1MitosisAnaphase-promoting complexCell biologyCDC20BiologyChemistryAnaphaseUbiquitinUbiquitin ligaseGeneCell cycleGeneticsCellCadherin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ndd1 activates the Mcm1–Fkh2 transcription factor to transcribe mitotic regulators. The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome activated by Cdh1 (APC/CCdh1) mediates the degradation of proteins throughout G1. Here we show that the APC/CCdh1 ubiquitinates Ndd1 and mediates its degradation, and that APC/CCdh1 activity suppresses accumulation of Ndd1 targets. We confirm putative Ndd1 targets and identify novel ones, many of them APC/CCdh1 substrates. The APC/CCdh1 thus regulates these proteins in a dual manner—both pretranscriptionally and post-translationally, forming a multi-layered feedforward loop (FFL). We predict by mathematical modelling and verify experimentally that this FFL introduces a lag between APC/CCdh1 inactivation at the end of G1 and accumulation of genes transcribed by Ndd1 in G2. This regulation generates two classes of APC/CCdh1 substrates, early ones that accumulate in S and late ones that accumulate in G2. Our results show how the dual state APC/CCdh1 activity is converted into multiple outputs by interactions between its substrates. Ndd1 activates the transcription of mitotic regulators. Here the authors show that the ubiquitin ligase complex APC/CCdh1ubiquitinates Ndd1 as well as Ndd1 target genes, creating a feedforward loop that generates an early class of substrates that accumulate at S phase and a late class that accumulate at G2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Communications→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→