Solution Properties of κ-Carrageenan and Its Interaction with Other Polysaccharides in Aqueous Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
America from Boston to Halifax and the Eucheuma species, which is obtained mainly from cultivation in shallow waters around the Philippines Carrageenans constitute from 30 to 80% of the cell wall of these algae, and their functionality depends on the species, season, and growing conditions. They are composed of linear chains of D-galactopyranosyl units linked via alternated (13)--D-and (14)--D-glucoside Some units contain a 3,6-anhydro ring. This provides a sulfate content of 15 to 40% Depending on the amount and position of the SO 3 -groups carrageenans are classified as , , , , , , and types (Stanley, 1987) (Figure The chemical and functional properties of each type of carrageenan are different due to the presence of sulfate groups. For example, and -carrageenan do form gels in the presence of counterions, whereas -carrageenan does not. The commercially available carrageenans are utilized to prepare a wide variety of gels; clear or cloudy, rigid or elastic, hard or soft, thermo-stable and with or without syneresis Carrageenan gels do not require refrigeration since they do not melt at room temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".