MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1490397540 · doi:10.2144/01312st02

Fluorescence Produced by Transfection Reagents Can Be Confused with Green Fluorescent Proteins in Mammalian Cells

2001· article· en· W1490397540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioTechniques · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsNortheast Cancer Centre
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGreen fluorescent proteinAequorea victoriaTransfectionFluorescenceFluorescence microscopeFusion proteinMolecular biologyBiologyFlow cytometryReporter geneChemistryGene expressionCell biologyRecombinant DNAGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter system is a convenient way to monitor gene expression and other cellular functions in mammalian cells. To study gene expression, a GFP-fusion plasmid construct is often transfected into mammalian cells using a variety of methods including calcium phosphate- and liposome-based DNA transfer. Subsequently, the expression of GFP-fusion protein is monitored by fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry. Here, we report that certain transfection reagents can produce fluorescence that can be detected in a wide range of wavelengths, which can be confused with GFP-fusion protein. The fluorescence false positives can be a problem, particularly when the GFP expression levels are low. To improve the GFP-based detection or screening methods, it is imperative to include an appropriate negative control and to detect GFP using a narrow-wavelength emission filter corresponding to the emission spectrum around the GFP peak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it