The ‘flap’ endonuclease gene FEN1 is excluded as a candidate gene implicated in the CAG repeat expansion underlying Huntington disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At least 12 disorders including Huntington disease (HD) are associated with expansion of a trinucleotide repeat (TNR). Factors contributing to the risk of expansion of TNRs and the mechanism of expansion have not been elucidated. Data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggest that the flap endonuclease FEN1 plays a role in expansion of repetitive DNA tracts. It has been hypothesized that insufficiency of FEN1 or a mutant FEN1 might contribute to the occurrence of expansion events of long repetitive DNA tracts after polymerase slippage events during lagging strand synthesis. The expression pattern of FEN1 was determined, and ubiquitous tissue expression, including germ cells, suggested that FEN1 has the potential to be involved in HD. Fifteen HD parent/child pairs that demonstrated intergenerational increases in CAG length of greater than 10 repeats were examined for possible mutations or polymorphisms within the FEN1 gene that could underlie the saltatory repeat expansions seen in these individuals. No alterations were observed compared to 50 controls, excluding FEN1 as a trans-acting factor underlying TNR expansion. The identification of a candidate gene(s) in HD or other CAG-expansion disorders implicated in TNR instability will elucidate the mechanism of expansion for this growing family of neurological disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".