MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500865157

TARDIF, M. Saberes docentes e formação profissional. Petrópolis, R.J.: Editora Vozes, 2002.

2008· article· pt· W1500865157 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cláudio Pellini Vargas

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumento - Revista de Estudo e Pesquisa em Educação · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quais sao os saberes que servem de base ao oficio de professor? Qual a natureza desses saberes? Sao tecnicos, de acao, de habilidades adquiridas? Sao apenas cognitivos? Sao de natureza social? E quanto a subjetividade existente na relacao professor/aluno? Como considera-la e analisa-la? Enfim, essas sao algumas das muitas questoes que o sociologo e filosofo canadense Maurice Tardif, da Universidade de Montreal, tenta responder ao longo de sua obra intitulada Saberes Docentes e Formacao Profissional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations330
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumento - Revista de Estudo e Pesquisa em EducaçãoSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207