MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1518200090 · doi:10.1593/neo.08174

Decitabine-Induced Demethylation of 5′ CpG Island in GADD45A Leads to Apoptosis in Osteosarcoma Cells

2008· article· en· W1518200090 on OpenAlexaff
Khaldoun Al‐Romaih, Bekim Sadiković, Maisa Yoshimoto, Yuzhuo Wang, Maria Zieleńska, Jeremy A. Squire

Bibliographic record

VenueNeoplasia · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer AgencyOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecitabineApoptosisCancer researchCarcinogenesisDNA methylationBiologyMolecular biologyCancerGene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GADD45 genes are epigenetically inactivated in various types of cancer and tumor cell lines. To date, defects of the GADD45 gene family have not been implicated in osteosarcoma (OS) oncogenesis, and the role of this pathway in regulating apoptosis in this tumor is unknown. The therapeutic potential of Gadd45 in OS emerged when our previous studies showed that GADD45A was reexpressed by treatment with the demethylation drug decitabine. In this study, we analyze the OS cell lines MG63 and U2OS and show that on treatment with decitabine, a significant loss of DNA methylation of GADD45A was associated with elevated expression and induction of apoptosis. In vivo affects of decitabine treatment in mice showed that untreated control xenografts exhibited low nuclear staining for Gadd45a protein, whereas the nuclei from xenografts in decitabine-treated mice exhibited increased amounts of protein and elevated apoptosis. To show the specificity of this gene for decitabine-induced apoptosis in OS, GADD45A mRNAs were disrupted using short interference RNA, and the ability of the drug to induce apoptosis was reduced. Understanding the role of demethylation of GADD45A in reexpression of this pathway and restoration of apoptotic control is important for understanding OS oncogenesis and for more targeted therapeutic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeoplasiaSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207