MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación. N. 1 (2009)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reservados todos los derechos.No se permite reproducir, almacenar en sistemas de recuperacin de la informacin, ni transmitir alguna parte de esta publicacin, cualquiera que sea el medio empleado -electrnico, mecnico, fotocopia, grabacin, etctera-, sin el permiso previo de los titulares de la propiedad intelectual.The great challenge of translation and audiovisual accessibility in the media 21 accessibility which demands from the beginning (2020) its own space for social interpreting within the realm of the "generic domain of accessibility".The author states that by doing this "we reinforce that which justifies the use of this term to differentiate a parcel of activity within the general practice of translation and interpreting".In this sense, the figures of the interpreter or translator as subjects who eliminate the communicative barriers acquire "the role of mediator agents of accessibility".The second article in this area, "Sign Language Interpreting on TV: a Reception Study of Visual Screen Exploration in Deaf Signing Users" by the authors Marta Bosch-Baliarda, Olga Soler-Vilageliu and Pilar Orero is a novel reception study within accessibility for people with functional auditory diversity, which, as the authors indicate, makes up for the lack of this type of study: "In addition to the limited broadcast time and variety of TV genres offered in sign language, best practice guidance based on test results for this access service is also limited."(italics ours).The authors analyze how a community of sign language users of 32 deaf people explores a television screen, which is in turn divided into two screens: a large screen for viewing content and a small screen for sign language interpreting.The composition of the screen changes as the small SLI screen pivots.This positional change of the small screen is done in order to first record the eye movements of the users through the Eye Tracker, and then evaluate the content recall through two questionnaires.The results obtained are interpreted in terms of perceptual strategies developed by the community of sign language users. Easy-to-understand accessibility services (E2U Access services)(Easy-to-read (E2R), Plain language (PL))Two articles have been included in this area: "New Taxonomy of Easy-tounderstand Access Services", by Roco Bernab Caro and "The Expert in Easy-to-understand Language: A New Educational and Professional Profile in the Field of the Spanish Language", by Blanca Arias-Badia and Anna Fernndez-Torn.In the first of these, the author asks whether the audiovisual content provided by the accessibility services available to us (audio description, subtitling
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".