MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1525270126 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v8n6p218

The Research Progress and Prospect of Employee Turnover Intention

2015· article· en· W1525270126 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Somchit Hongvichit

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEmployer Branding and e-HRM
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurnoverAntecedent (behavioral psychology)Turnover intentionConnotationHuman resource managementEmployee researchBusinessPsychologyControl (management)Employee motivationMarketingJob satisfactionSocial psychologyManagementEconomicsOrganizational commitment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employee turnover management is an important aspect of human resource management, how to effectively control and predict employee turnover becomes an important content of academic research. Related research results show that the turnover intention is employee turnover behavior of the most direct antecedents, can predict employee turnover behavior. The author reviews the employee turnover intention, the connotation of the antecedent variables and measurement, the future trend of development and research on employee turnover tendency is analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicEmployer Branding and e-HRMFrench-language works237,207