<i>Vibrio cholerae</i> El Tor TcpA crystal structure and mechanism for pilus‐mediated microcolony formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type IV pili (T4P) are critical to virulence for Vibrio cholerae and other bacterial pathogens. Among their diverse functions, T4P mediate microcolony formation, which protects the bacteria from host defences and concentrates secreted toxins. The T4P of the two V. cholerae O1 disease biotypes, classical and El Tor, share 81% identity in their TcpA subunits, yet these filaments differ in their interaction patterns as assessed by electron microscopy. To understand the molecular basis for pilus-mediated microcolony formation, we solved a 1.5 A resolution crystal structure of N-terminally truncated El Tor TcpA and compared it with that of classical TcpA. Residues that differ between the two pilins are located on surface-exposed regions of the TcpA subunits. By iteratively changing these non-conserved amino acids in classical TcpA to their respective residues in El Tor TcpA, we identified residues that profoundly affect pilus:pilus interaction patterns and bacterial aggregation. These residues lie on either the protruding d-region of the TcpA subunit or in a cavity between pilin subunits in the pilus filament. Our results support a model whereby pili interact via intercalation of surface protrusions on one filament into depressions between subunits on adjacent filaments as a means to hold V. cholerae cells together in microcolonies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".