Lack of SeqA focus formation, specific DNA binding and proper protein multimerization in the <i>Escherichia coli</i> sequestration mutant <i>seqA2</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Escherichia coli wild-type cells newly formed origins cannot be reinitiated. The prevention of reinitiation is termed sequestration and is dependent on the hemimethylated state of newly replicated DNA. Several mutants discovered in a screen for the inability to sequester hemimethylated origins have been mapped to the seqA gene. Here, one of these mutants, seqA2, harbouring a single amino acid change in the C-terminal end of the SeqA protein, was found to also be unable to form foci in vivo. The SeqA foci seen in the wild-type cells are believed to arise from multimerization of SeqA on hemimethylated DNA at the replication fork, presumably representing organization of newly formed DNA by SeqA. The result suggests that the process of origin sequestration is closely tied to the process of focus maintenance at the replication fork. In vitro, purified SeqA2 protein was found incapable of forming highly ordered multimers that bind hemimethylated oriC. The mutant protein was also incapable of restraining negative supercoils. Both in vivo and in vitro results support the idea that origin sequestration is an integral part of organization of newly formed DNA performed by SeqA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".