Dual approaches to strictly positive real controller synthesis with a performance using linear matrix inequalities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The synthesis of controllers that minimize a performance index subject to a strictly positive real (SPR) constraint is considered. Two controller synthesis methods are presented that are then combined into an iterative algorithm. Each method synthesizes optimal SPR controllers by posing a convex optimization problem where constraints are enforced via linear matrix inequalities. Additionally, each method fixes the controller state‐feedback gain matrix and finds an observer gain matrix such that an upper bound on the closed‐loop ‐norm is minimized and the controller is SPR. The first method retools the standard ‐optimal control problem by using a common Lyapunov matrix variable to satisfy both the criteria and the SPR constraint. The second method overcomes bilinear matrix inequality issues associated with the performance and the SPR constraint by employing a completing the square method and an overbounding technique. Both synthesis methods are used within an iterative scheme to find optimal SPR controllers in a sequential manner. Comparison of our synthesis methods to existing methods in the literature is presented. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it