MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Better late than early: delayed translation of intron‐encoded endonuclease I‐TevI is required for efficient splicing of its host group I intron

2010· article· en· W1544147210 on OpenAlexafffund
Ewan A. Gibb, David R. Edgell

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIntronBiologyRNA splicingGroup II intronHoming endonucleaseEndonucleaseGeneticsGroup I catalytic intronGeneCell biologyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The td group I intron interrupting the thymidylate synthase (TS) gene of phage T4 is a mobile intron that encodes the homing endonuclease I-TevI. Efficient RNA splicing of the intron is required to restore function of the TS gene, while expression of I-TevI from within the intron is required to initiate intron mobility. Three distinct layers of regulation temporally limit I-TevI expression to late in the T4 infective cycle, yet the biological rationale for stringent regulation has not been tested. Here, we deleted key control elements to deregulate I-TevI expression at early and middle times post T4 infection. Strikingly, we found that deregulation of I-TevI, or of a catalytically inactive variant, generated a thymidine-dependent phenotype that is caused by a reduction in td intron splicing. Prematurely terminating I-TevI translation restores td splicing, full-length TS synthesis, and rescues the thymidine-dependent phenotype. We suggest that stringent translational control of I-TevI evolved to prevent the ribosome from disrupting key structural elements of the td intron that are required for splicing and TS function at early and middle times post T4 infection. Analogous translational regulatory mechanisms in unrelated intron-open reading frame arrangements may also function to limit deleterious consequences on splicing and host gene function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207