Feminist geography in practice : research and methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acknowledgments.List of Figures and Tables.Notes on Contributors.1. Taking on, Thinking about, and Doing Feminist Research in Geography. (Pamela Moss)Part I: Taking on Feminist Research.Defining Feminism?: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Short 1. Being Feminist in Geography - Feminist Geography in the German-Speaking Academy: History of a Movement. (Elisabeth Baschlind)2. Making Space for Personal Journeys. (Mary Gilmartin)3. Feminist Epistemology in Geography. (Meghan Cope)4. The Difference Feminism Makes: Researching Unemployed Women in an Australian Region. (Louise C. Johnson)Study Material for Taking on Feminist Research: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Part II: Thinking about Feminist Research.Delimiting Language?: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Short 2. Putting Feminist Geography into Practice - Gender, Place and Culture: Paradoxical Spaces?. (Liz Bondi) 5. Paradoxical Space: Geography, Men, and Duppy Feminism. (David Butz and Lawrence D. Berg) 6. Toward a More Fully Reflexive Feminist Geography. (Karen Falconer Al-Hindi and Hope Kawabata)7. People Like Us: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in the Research Process. (Gill Valentine)Study Material for Thinking About Feminist Research: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Part III: Doing Feminist Research.Decentering Authority!: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Short 3. Doing Geography as a Feminist - Reconsidering Success and Failure in Feminist Research. (Maureen G. Reed)8. Doing Feminist Fieldwork about Geography Fieldwork. (Karen Nairn)9. Quantitative Methods and Feminist Geographic Research. (Mei-Po Kwan)10. Borderlands in Feminist Ethnography. (Joan Marshall)11. Negotiating Positionings: Exchanging Life Stories in Research Interviews. (Deirdre McKay)12. Interviewing Elites: Cautionary Tales about Researching Women Magazines in Canada's Banking Industry. (Kim V. L. England) 13. Studying Immigrants in Focus Groups. (Geraldine Pratt) Study Material for Doing Feminist Research: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.14. Further Notes on Feminist Research: Embodied Knowledge in Place. (Isabel Dyck)References.Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.050 | 0.074 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.146 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".