MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1552953545

Feminist geography in practice : research and methods

2002· book· en· W1552953545 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismFeminist philosophyGender studiesSociologyFeminist theoryNegotiationCritical geographyFeminist epistemologyEthnographyCultural geographySocial scienceAnthropologyHuman geography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acknowledgments.List of Figures and Tables.Notes on Contributors.1. Taking on, Thinking about, and Doing Feminist Research in Geography. (Pamela Moss)Part I: Taking on Feminist Research.Defining Feminism?: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Short 1. Being Feminist in Geography - Feminist Geography in the German-Speaking Academy: History of a Movement. (Elisabeth Baschlind)2. Making Space for Personal Journeys. (Mary Gilmartin)3. Feminist Epistemology in Geography. (Meghan Cope)4. The Difference Feminism Makes: Researching Unemployed Women in an Australian Region. (Louise C. Johnson)Study Material for Taking on Feminist Research: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Part II: Thinking about Feminist Research.Delimiting Language?: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Short 2. Putting Feminist Geography into Practice - Gender, Place and Culture: Paradoxical Spaces?. (Liz Bondi) 5. Paradoxical Space: Geography, Men, and Duppy Feminism. (David Butz and Lawrence D. Berg) 6. Toward a More Fully Reflexive Feminist Geography. (Karen Falconer Al-Hindi and Hope Kawabata)7. People Like Us: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in the Research Process. (Gill Valentine)Study Material for Thinking About Feminist Research: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Part III: Doing Feminist Research.Decentering Authority!: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.Short 3. Doing Geography as a Feminist - Reconsidering Success and Failure in Feminist Research. (Maureen G. Reed)8. Doing Feminist Fieldwork about Geography Fieldwork. (Karen Nairn)9. Quantitative Methods and Feminist Geographic Research. (Mei-Po Kwan)10. Borderlands in Feminist Ethnography. (Joan Marshall)11. Negotiating Positionings: Exchanging Life Stories in Research Interviews. (Deirdre McKay)12. Interviewing Elites: Cautionary Tales about Researching Women Magazines in Canada's Banking Industry. (Kim V. L. England) 13. Studying Immigrants in Focus Groups. (Geraldine Pratt) Study Material for Doing Feminist Research: Feminist Pedagogy Working Group.14. Further Notes on Feminist Research: Embodied Knowledge in Place. (Isabel Dyck)References.Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.117
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1170.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.512
GPT teacher head0.690
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations323
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFrench-language works237,207