PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE CAD COMPLEX FROM THE PRIMITIVE RED ALGA <i>CYANIDIOSCHYZON MEROLAE</i> (CYANIDIALES, RHODOPHYTA)<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway consists of six enzymes: carbamoyl‐phosphate synthetase II (CPS II), aspartate carbamoyltransferase (ACT), dihydroorotase (DHO), dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase, and orotidine‐5′‐monophosphate decarboxylase. The origin and organization of the first three enzymes differ markedly between Opisthokonta (Metazoa and Fungi) and the Amoebozoa and green plants. However, no information has been available regarding the characteristics of such genes in other photosynthetic eukaryotes. In this study, we examined the pyrimidine biosynthetic cluster in the primitive red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae P. DeLuca et al. isolate 10D. Unlike the situation in green plants, the CPS II, ACT, and DHO of C . merolae were fused to form a single open reading frame (the CAD complex), as in the Opisthokonta and Amoebozoa. Phylogenetic analysis of the CPS domain sequences suggested that this red algal CAD complex did not result from a recent lateral gene transfer from Metazoa or Fungi but that the fusion of the three genes occurred before the divergence of Opisthokonta, Amoebozoa, and the red algae. These results cast doubt on the recent hypothesis that the Opisthokonta and Amoebozoa form a monophyletic group, based on the presence in both of the CAD complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".