MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Successful inhibition of Dnmt1 expression in bovine using RNA interference.

2009· article· en· W15836969 on OpenAlexafffund
Hector Eduardo Sosa, Jonathan LaMarre, Allan G. King

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsRNA interferenceReprogrammingDNMT1BiologyGene knockdownEpigeneticsDNA methylationMethylationMolecular biologyGene expressionGene silencingSmall hairpin RNACell biologyGeneRNAGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epigenetic modifications, such as methylation are essential for normal mammalian development. Dnmt1 is the predominant and most active methylase, which is responsible for copying methylation patterns after replication. During early development, Dnmt1 is highly regulated to support passive demethylation and normal reprogramming. In somatic cells, Dnmt1 is localized in the nucleus and its introduction into cloned embryos is believed to be the main limiting factor for proper reprogramming of the donor genome. The aim of this study was to transiently suppress Dnmt1 by RNA interference (RNAi) to investigate the role of Dnmt1 during early development and its effect on nuclear transfer technology. RNA and protein extracts were collected from fibroblasts treated with control or Dnmt1 RNAi. Real time RT‐PCR revealed a 93.4% reduction of Dnmt1 transcript levels. Consistently, Western blot analysis showed a protein decrease of up to 98.8%. Gene expression of housekeeping genes, GAPD, ACTB and lamin A/C, were not affected after RNAi treatment however, expression of HPRT1, H19, MMP1 and SCYA genes was increased. This is the first report to demonstrate a specific and highly effective knockdown of bovine Dnmt1 by RNAi at both mRNA and protein levels. Dnmt1 RNAi could be a useful tool to better understand epigenetic reprogramming events as well as syndromes related to abnormal methylation patterns. (Funding by CONACyT & NSERC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207