CXCR3 ligands promote expression of functional indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in basal cell carcinoma keratinocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignancy in humans worldwide. Studies suggest that BCCs exhibit immunoprotection, similar to other keratinocyte carcinomas, although the mechanisms of defence have not been defined. OBJECTIVES: To examine if indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), an immune privilege-associated enzyme, would be expressed in BCC, regulated in part by CXCR3. METHODS: We analysed the expression and function of IDO in human BCC (hBCC) tissues using nonlesional skin epithelial (NL) tissues as a control. RESULTS: Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) revealed significant upregulation of IDO1 and IDO2 (12·5- and 19·14-fold change, respectively) in nodular hBCCs as compared with NL tissues. Immunohistochemistry showed that IDO colocalized with keratin 17, a BCC keratinocyte marker, in hBCC tissues. Western blot identified a full-length IDO (42 kDa) product and a splice variant (∼30 kDa) in BCC tissues. Kynurenine assays and qPCR were conducted to determine IDO enzymatic activity in hBCCs in vitro with CXCL11 supplementation, which has previously been shown to be required for the tumour cell growth. Addition of CXCL11 upregulated IDO2 and increased l-kynurenine concentration in a dose-dependent manner in hBCCs while normal primary keratinocytes exhibited no response. CONCLUSIONS: The expression of IDO at both mRNA and protein levels in hBCC tissues, the upregulation of IDO2 and the IDO-mediated l-kynurenine production in hBCCs with CXCL11 treatment suggest that functional IDO is synthesized by hBCC tumours and may be used as a method of immunoprotection during tumorigenesis. Also, IDO enzymatic activity may be modulated by CXCR3/CXCL11 signalling in BCCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".