MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Serpins 2005 – fun between the β‐sheets

2005· article· en· W1589170899 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James C. Whisstock, Stephen Bottomley, Phillip I. Bird, Robert N. Pike, Paul Coughlin

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of CambridgeCentre for Blood Research, University of British ColumbiaNational Eye InstituteMedical School, University of MichiganNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsSerpinProteaseBiologyProteolysisProteasesEukaryoteSerine Proteinase InhibitorsSerine proteaseBiochemistryCell biologyGenomeEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serpins are the largest family of protease inhibitors and are fundamental for the control of proteolysis in multicellular eukaryotes. Most eukaryote serpins inhibit serine or cysteine proteases, however, noninhibitory members have been identified that perform diverse functions in processes such as hormone delivery and tumour metastasis. More recently inhibitory serpins have been identified in prokaryotes and unicellular eukaryotes, nevertheless, the precise molecular targets of these molecules remains to be identified. The serpin mechanism of protease inhibition is unusual and involves a major conformational rearrangement of the molecule concomitant with a distortion of the target protease. As a result of this requirement, serpins are susceptible to mutations that result in polymerization and conformational diseases such as the human serpinopathies. This review reports on recent major discoveries in the serpin field, based upon presentations made at the 4th International Symposium on Serpin Structure, Function and Biology (Cairns, Australia).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS JournalSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207