Pharmacokinetics of a Cytochrome P450 2E1 Probe, Chlorzoxazone, and its 6-Hydroxy Metabolite in Poloxamer 407-Induced Hyperlipidemic Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the possible changes in CYP2E1 expression and activity in hyperlipidemia (HL), we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of chlorzoxazone (CZX) as a CYP2E1 probe in rats with HL induced by poloxamer 407 (HL rats). METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of CZX and its 6-hydroxy metabolite (OH-CZX) were evaluated after intravenous administration of 20 mg/kg CZX to both control and HL rats. We also examined changes in the expression of CYP2E1 and its in vitro metabolic activity in hepatic microsomal fractions from HL rats. RESULTS: The total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of CZX in the HL rats after its intravenous administration was comparable with that in the controls due to unchanged non-renal clearance (CLNR). The AUC of OH-CZX and AUCOH-CZX/AUCCZX ratios in HL rats also remained unchanged. This was primarily due to the comparable hepatic CLint for metabolism of CZX to OH-CZX via CYP2E1 between the control and HL rats as a result of unchanged expression of CYP2E1 in HL rats. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate CYP2E1 expression and activity in HL rats and their effects on the pharmacokinetics of a CYP2E1 probe drug. These findings have potential therapeutic implications assuming that the HL rat model qualitatively reflects similar changes in patients with HL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".