Down-regulation of CXCR-4 and CCR-5 expression by interferon-<i>γ</i>is associated with inhibition of chemotaxis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication but not HIV entry into human monocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alterations in the expression of CXCR4 and CCR5, the co-receptors for HIV entry, may be associated with susceptibility of monocytic cells to HIV infection. Interferon (IFN)-gamma has been shown to inhibit HIV replication in monocytic cells, but the molecular mechanism involved is not well understood. To determine if IFN-gamma regulates HIV replication by altering CXCR-4/CCR-5 expression and hence virus entry into monocytic cells, we investigated the effects of IFN-gamma on CXCR-4 and CCR-5 expression and its biological implications with respect to HIV entry, replication and chemotaxis towards the CXCR-4 and CCR-5 ligands SDF-1 and MIP-1alpha, respectively. IFN-gamma decreased CXCR-4 and CCR-5 expression on monocytes derived from HIV-negative adults, HIV-positive adults and HIV-negative cord blood. This down-regulation of chemokine receptor expression did not result in a corresponding change in mRNA expression but was associated with elevated levels of the endogenously produced chemokines SDF-1 and RANTES. Furthermore, IFN-gamma inhibited chemotaxis in response to SDF-1 and MIP-1alpha, inhibited HIV replication, but failed to inhibit virus entry in monocytic cells. These results suggest that although IFN-gamma-induced down-regulation of CXCR-4 and CCR-5 expression is associated with an inhibition of SDF-1-/MIP-1alpha-mediated chemotaxis, IFN-gamma-induced inhibition of HIV replication may be mediated at levels subsequent to the virus entry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".