Live-Cell Nucleocytoplasmic Protein Shuttle Assay Utilizing Laser Confocal Microscopy and FRAP
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In eukaryotes, protein trafficking to and from the nucleus, or shuttling, has been demonstrated to be an important function for proteins that have vital roles in one or both subcellular compartments. Current techniques of detecting protein nuclear shuttling are extremely labor intensive and only statically visualize evidence of shuttling. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), or fluorescence microphotolysis, has proven to be an effective method of analyzing protein dynamics in live cells, especially when coupled to GFP technology. Here, we describe a relatively simple in vivo protein nuclear shuttling assay that utilizes red fluorescent and green fluorescent protein fusions as substrates for FRAP using a laser confocal microscope. This technique is less time consuming than established shuttle assays, is internally controlled, and visualizes nucleocytoplasmic shuttling in living cells of the same species and cell type. This technique can be potentially used to detect the ability of any nuclear protein to shuttle from the nucleus to any other subcellular compartment for any eukaryotic species in which GFP or dsRed1 fusion protein can be expressed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it