MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603054107 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2339

CTLs Contain and Use Intracellular Stores of FasL Distinct from Cytolytic Granules

2007· article· en· W1603054107 on OpenAlexaff
Jin-Shu He, Hanne L. Ostergaard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDivision of Chemistry
KeywordsCytolysisIntracellularFas ligandCell biologyBiologyChemistryVirologyCytotoxic T cellBiochemistryApoptosisIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CTL lyse target cells through the release of cytolytic granule contents and cell surface expression of Fas ligand (FasL). Current models suggest that FasL is stored in cytolytic granules and that FasL cell surface expression would be subject to the same controls as degranulation. We demonstrate that murine CTLs undergo two waves of FasL cell surface expression after stimulation. The first wave is from a pre-existing pool of FasL, and the second wave requires new protein synthesis. Signaling for FasL expression appears to be finely tuned as a weak signal preferentially induced surface translocation of the stored FasL, whereas a strong signal preferentially triggered the expression of de novo synthesized FasL. The early FasL is differentially regulated from degranulation, as there were multiple circumstances whereby rapid FasL cell surface expression and FasL-dependent killing occurred in the absence of detectable degranulation. Furthermore, we found through confocal microscopy that stored FasL resides in vesicles distinct from cytolytic granules. Our data clearly show that CTL degranulation and FasL lytic mechanisms are fully independent with respect to stored component localization and regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207