RETRACTED: A recommended specification for heavy vehicle rear underrun guards
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions;Ethical Violations by Author;Plagiarism of/in Article;
- Date
- 7/1/2008 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Topic
- Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
- Field
- Engineering
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- Transport Canada
- Keywords
- Guard (computer science)TruckCrashTrailerCrash testIntrusionEngineeringAutomotive engineeringPoison controlTransport engineeringAeronauticsComputer scienceSimulation
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no