Spring loading a pre-cleavage intermediate for hairpin telomere formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Borrelia telomere resolvase, ResT, forms the unusual hairpin telomeres of the linear Borrelia replicons in a process referred to as telomere resolution. Telomere resolution is a DNA cleavage and rejoining reaction that proceeds from a replicated telomere intermediate in a reaction with mechanistic similarities to that catalyzed by type IB topoisomerases. Previous reports have implicated the hairpin-binding module, at the end of the N-terminal domain of ResT, in distorting the DNA between the scissile phosphates so as to promote DNA cleavage and hairpin formation by the catalytic domain. We report that unwinding the DNA between the scissile phosphates, prior to DNA cleavage, is a key cold-sensitive step in telomere resolution. Through the analysis of ResT mutants, rescued by substrate modifications that mimic DNA unwinding between the cleavage sites, we show that formation and/or stabilization of an underwound pre-cleavage intermediate depends upon cooperation of the hairpin-binding module and catalytic domain. The phenotype of the mutants argues that the pre-cleavage intermediate promotes strand ejection to favor the forward reaction and that subsequent hairpin capture is a reversible reaction step. These reaction features are proposed to promote hairpin formation over strand resealing while allowing reversal back to substrate of aborted reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".