MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1806732830 · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0723-0

Epigenome data release: a participant-centered approach to privacy protection

2015· article· en· W1806732830 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephanie O. M. Dyke, Warren Cheung, Yann Joly, Ole Ammerpohl, Pavlo Lutsik, Mark A. Rothstein, Maxime Caron, Stephan Busche, Guillaume Bourque, Lars Rönnblom, Paul Flicek, Stephan Beck, Martin Hirst, Henk G. Stunnenberg, Reiner Siebert, Jörn Walter, Tomi Pastinen

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC Cancer AgencyMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDeutsches Zentrum für LungenforschungKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseInterregEuropean CommissionVetenskapsrådetBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute of General Medical SciencesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory
KeywordsEpigenomeEpigenomicsENCODEBiologyHuman geneticsDNA methylationComputational biologyHuman genomeAmbiguityGenomeGenomicsComputer scienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale epigenome mapping by the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Project, the ENCODE Consortium and the International Human Epigenome Consortium (IHEC) produces genome-wide DNA methylation data at one base-pair resolution. We examine how such data can be made open-access while balancing appropriate interpretation and genomic privacy. We propose guidelines for data release that both reduce ambiguity in the interpretation of open-access data and limit immediate access to genetic variation data that are made available through controlled access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.318
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.390
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3180.390
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0180.020
Open science0.0090.025
Research integrity0.0100.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome BiologySame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207