Rapid high‐yield <i>N</i>‐acylation of aminothiols: <i>N</i>‐acetylglutathione and <i>N</i>‐acetylhomocysteine and their thiol p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> values
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methodology for the rapid N-acylation of aminothiols in aqueous solution using procedures commonly employed in biochemical studies is described here. Glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and homocystine were diN-acetylated in ~100% yield in 0.1 M aqueous NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) at room temperature by 2.5 equiv of the activated ester, N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl acetate, an efficient water-soluble acetylating reagent. Following acetone precipitation, diN-acetylGSSG was further purified and desalted on a strong anion-exchange (SAX) cartridge. DiN-acetylhomocystine was simultaneously purified and desalted on a C18 cartridge. The N-acetylated aminothiols were generated using gel-immobilized tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine as a reductant, which obviated the need for further purification. Alternatively, disulfide exchange with dissolved dithiothreitol yielded N-acetylglutathione, which was purified on the SAX cartridge. pH titrations of N-acetylglutathione (8.99) and N-acetylhomocysteine (9.66) as well as those of commercially available N-acetylcysteine (9.53) and N-acetylpenicillamine (10.21) yielded pK(a) (SH) values of importance for biological studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it