MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

How ethical is your clinical trial?

2010· article· en· W1850073871 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lee M. Miller, Morẹ́nikẹ́ Oluwátóyìn Foláyan, Dan Allman, Busiwe Nkala, L. M. Kasirye, Laia Ruiz Mingote, Gabriela Junqueira Calazans, Rosemary Mburu, Fanelesibonge Ntombela, Melissa Ditmore

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Practice · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute on Drug Abuse
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialPsychological interventionResearch ethicsInformed consentInstitutional review boardClinical researchHealth carePandemicHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Family medicinePublic relationsAlternative medicineNursingCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychiatryPathologyEconomic growthDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Is Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and a rigorous informed consent process enough? It is our view that this is no longer the case. Conventional research ethics emphasise the importance of weighing the risks and benefits for prospective participants as one of the key determinants of deeming a clinical trial ethical. We support the notion that ethical obligations of research should include considerations not only at the individual level, but also at the community level (1,2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.546
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.731
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5460.731
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0080.050
Scholarly communication0.0420.023
Open science0.0080.006
Research integrity0.0510.055
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.787
GPT teacher head0.761
Teacher spread0.027 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical PracticeSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207