MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Employees Perceptions on Reward Practice at Toyota 3S Centre: A Case Study in Malaysia

2011· article· en· W1867858958 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zaherawati Zakaria, Zaliha Hj Hussin, Nazni Noordin, Mohd Zool Hilmie Mohamed Sawal, Zuriawati Zakaria, Mohammad Noor, Priscilla Maras

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransparency (behavior)Reward systemPunctualityBusinessQuality (philosophy)PerceptionPublic relationsWork (physics)MarketingPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Reward practice is the term which referring to the rewarding approaches which includes several rewarding programs as applied in many organizations today in both public and private sectors. Employees today are more concerning on the rewarding approaches in which they seek for the ground elements that should be demonstrated in accordance to ensure that one’s organizational reward practice will be effective as possible. Thus, the study is to investigate the relationship between employees’ perception on transparency, fairness, controllability and the reward values of reward practice and employees’ performances at TOYOTA 3S Centre SP Selatan Otomobil Sdn Bhd, Kedah in 2009. By using the convenience sampling technique, the employees were given questionnaires regarding the reward practice in the organization to be answered. Due to the small populations in the company are 82 persons comprises of the employer and the employees. As a result of findings, the study shows that all factors were not significant to contribute employees’ performances. Moreover, even the transparency factor which gives the highest degree of contribution still not significant. As recommendation, the study suggest that organization should be aware on the rights of the other potential employees to be listed in the reward programme. Thus, the top management need to assign the specific resource person to run the performance appraisals because the level of commitment to work were not only on the basis of how many cars were repaired; or how many car being sold; but it also involves with the quality of work, the punctuality of finishing job, the discipline and ethics manner and also the employee efforts towards knowledge sharing. In future research, the organization should have to encounter this problem by allocating the most valued reward only for the high achievers in the organization. The reward values may not only necessary to be in the monetary form, but should also alternatively being provided in other form such as the employer’s appraise in the employee recognition. Key Words: Reward; Practice; Employees; Employer; Performances; Compensation; RecognitionResume: La pratique de recompense est le terme qui refere a l'approche de la recompense qui comprend plusieurs programmes de recompense tel qu'il est applique dans des nombreuses organisations aujourd'hui dans les deux secteurs public et prive. Les employes d'aujourd'hui sont plus concernes sur les recompense qui abordent dans lequel ils cherchent pour des elements de base qui devraient etre demontree conformement de telle sorte que la pratique de recompense de l’organisation sera la plus efficace que possible. Ainsi, l'etude est d'etudier la relation entre la perception des salaries sur la transparence, l'equite, la controlabilite et la valeur de recompense de la pratique et les performances des employes au centre de 3S SP Selatan Otomobil Sdn, Kedah a TOYOTA en 2009. En utilisant la technique d'echantillonnage de commodite, les questionnaires concernant la pratique de recompense de l’organisation ont ete donnes aux employes afin de collecter leur reponse. En raison de la faible population dans cette entreprise de 82 personnes composee de l'employeur et les employes. A la suite de ces recherches, l'etude montre que tous les facteurs n'etaient pas significatifs pour contribuer la performances des employes. En outre, meme le facteur de transparence qui donne le plus haut degre de la contribution reste pas significative. Comme dans la recommandation, l'etude suggere que l'organisation doit etre conscient sur les droits des autres employes potentiels pour figurer dans le programme de recompenses. Ainsi, les cadres superieurs ont besoin d'affecter la personne de ressource specifique pour executer les evaluations de performance parce que le niveau d'engagement au travail ont ete non seulement sur la base de combien de voitures ont ete reparees, ou combien de voitures ont ete vendues, mais il implique egalement la qualite du travail, la ponctualite de finition du travail, la discipline et de facon ethique, ainsi que les efforts des employes vers le partage des connaissances. Dans des recherches de futures, l'organisation devrait avoir a rencontrer ce probleme en attribuant la recompense la plus precieuse seulement pour les tres performants dans l'organisation. Les valeurs de recompense peut non seulement necessaire d'etre sous la forme monetaire, mais aussi etre fourni de maniere alternativement sous forme de l’'evaluation des employeurs dans la reconnaissance des employes. Mots cles: Recompense; Pratique; Les salaries; Employeurs; Performances; La remuneration; La reconnaissance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicEducation and Islamic StudiesFrench-language works237,207