Aberrant Splicing and Premature Termination of Transcription of the FVIII Gene as a Cause of Severe Canine Hemophilia A: Similarities with the Intron 22 Inversion Mutation in Human Hemophilia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have identified the causative mutation in the hemophilia A dog colony at Queen's University, Canada and have observed a striking similarity with the intron 22 inversion found in approximately 45% of severely affected hemophilia A patients. The canine hemophilia A phenotype arises from aberrant splicing and premature termination of transcription of the FVIII gene, resulting in a polyadenylated transcript lacking exons distal to 22 and terminating with a novel sequence element (NSE). In dogs and other species including humans, this NSE is present in low copy number. One copy of these sequences in the canine genome is within intron 22 and reveals differences in the hybridization banding patterns between normal and hemophilic DNA, suggestive of a large genomic rearrangement. The mutation mechanism may not be uncommon, as identical mutant transcripts were isolated from two hemophilia A littermates that are unrelated to the Queen's colony and from hemophiliac dogs in the colony at Chapel Hill.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".