Production and characterization of Tm<sup>3+</sup>/Yb<sup>3+</sup> codoped pedestal-type PbO–GeO<sub>2</sub> waveguides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work explores the production and characterization of pedestal-type active waveguides based on PbO–GeO2 (PGO) thin films codoped with Tm3+/Yb3+ rare earth ions. Silicon wafers containing around 1.7 μm of SiO2 thickness were used as substrate, and the pedestal structure was obtained by conventional photolithography and plasma etching in a reactive ion etching reactor. Plasma etching procedures were made in steps to reduce roughness at the laterals and sidewalls of waveguides. Around 0.5 μm of Tm3+/Yb3+ codoped PGO thin film was obtained by radio frequency magnetron sputtering deposition after etching procedures. Results of scanning electron microscopy confirmed the waveguide pedestal profile. Optical propagation losses around 4, 5, and 20 dB/cm were observed at 1050, 633, and 543 nm, respectively, for waveguide width in the 30–100 μm range. Near field profiles at these wavelengths and also at 980 nm are also reported and confirmed the multimode coupling behavior. The present results corroborate the possibility of using Tm3+/Yb3+ codoped PGO thin films as active waveguides for photonic applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".