The zinc‐binding site of a class I aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase is a SWIM domain that modulates amino acid binding via the tRNA acceptor arm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In its tRNA acceptor end binding domain, the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) of Escherichia coli contains one atom of zinc that holds the extremities of a segment (Cys98-x-Cys100-x24-Cys125-x-His127) homologous to the Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) loop where a leucine residue stabilizes the peeled-back conformation of tRNAGln acceptor end. We report here that the GluRS zinc-binding region belongs to the novel SWIM domain family characterized by the signature C-x-C-xn-C-x-H (n = 6-25), and predicted to interact with DNA or proteins. In the presence of tRNAGlu, the GluRS C100Y variant has a lower affinity for l-glutamate than the wild-type enzyme, with Km and Kd values increased 12- and 20-fold, respectively. On the other hand, in the absence of tRNAGlu, glutamate binds with the same affinity to the C100Y variant and to wild-type GluRS. In the context of the close structural and mechanistic similarities between GluRS and GlnRS, these results indicate that the GluRS SWIM domain modulates glutamate binding to the active site via its interaction with the tRNAGlu acceptor arm. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that ancestral GluRSs had a strong zinc-binding site in their SWIM domain. Considering that all GluRSs require a cognate tRNA to activate glutamate, and that some of them have different or no putative zinc-binding residues in the corresponding positions, the properties of the C100Y variant suggest that the GluRS SWIM domains evolved to position correctly the tRNA acceptor end in the active site, thereby contributing to the formation of the glutamate binding site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".