MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1928323250 · doi:10.1002/pds.2200

Source document verification in the Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry

2011· article· en· W1928323250 on OpenAlexaff
Karien Verhulst, Laura Artiles‐Carloni, Michael Beck, Joe T.R. Clarke, Jordão Corrêa Neto, Gerald F. Cox, Paul M. Fernhoff, Nathalie Guffon, Yuanyuan Kong, Ana María Martins, Anna Tylki‐Szymańska, Chester B. Whitley, Frits A. Wijburg, Edward J. Wraith, Catherine M. Koepper

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConfidence intervalAuditObservational studyPharmacoepidemiologyMissing dataData collectionMeta-analysisPediatricsFamily medicineStatisticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I (MPS I) Registry is an international observational database that tracks the natural history and the outcomes of patients with MPS I. The Registry was a regulatory requirement following the approval of laronidase enzyme replacement therapy for MPS I in 2003. All data are collected voluntarily after informed consent from the patient or family. Data are checked through queries, monthly reviews, and electronic audits to identify missing, inconsistent, or invalid data. This analysis sought to determine overall data accuracy in the Registry through source document verification (SDV). METHODS: Two phases of SDV were performed. In each phase, Registry data were compared against source documents at sites in Europe, Latin America, and North America. Three patients were randomly selected for SDV at each of the selected sites among all patients enrolled ≥18 months and ever receiving laronidase. Key parameters central to MPS I and its treatment were examined from the baseline and the last available assessments. RESULTS: Results indicate an overall source-to-database error rate in the MPS I Registry of 2.7% (47 discrepancies out of 1715 items; 95% confidence interval [2.2%, 3.5%]) in Phase 1 and 3.7% (64 discrepancies out of 1732 items; 95% confidence interval [2.9%, 4.7%]) in Phase 2. No systematic errors were found. CONCLUSIONS: The overall error rates in both phases of SDV demonstrate acceptable data accuracy in the MPS I Registry within the data fields that were assessed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacoepidemiology and Drug SafetySame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207