MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W195474867

'Samuil Marshak's translations Wordsworth's "Lucy" Poems (1)

2005· article· en· W195474867 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kenneth H. Ober, Warren U. Ober

Bibliographic record

VenueGermano-Slavica · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryBalladLiteratureLyricsPhilosophyArtMemoirDepictionElegiac
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ironically, William Wordsworth (1770-1850)--the greatest English poet since Milton and one whose historical influence on language, ideas, and manners has been immense according to the respected scholar English Romanticism, Carl Woodring--has been translated to little effect ... relative to Dante, Shakespeare, Bunyan, or Dostoevsky. (2) One the relatively few translators Wordsworth has been Samuil Marshak (1887-1964), quintessential Soviet Russian man letters his time. Marshak was successful poet, translator, political satirist and state propagandist, magazine editor, and author children's books. Moreover, he was the founder the state children's publishing house, and in his moving depiction pre-revolutionary Jewish life in his memoirs he established himself as a link in the chain many generations Russian Jewry. (3) One the projects Marshak undertook as poet-translator involved four the five short lyrics Wordsworth that posterity has brought together under the rubric the poems. (These four poems appear below in Appendix A; Marshak's translations, in Cyrillic, appear in Appendix B; our back-translations Marshak's versions appear in Appendix C.) (4) It should be noted at the outset that much is lost if the reader tends to view the poems as simply traditional poems. The poems in fact, first all, as Geoffrey Durrant says, 'lyrical ballads,' each which tells verse story and presents it dramatically. To confuse the mode the 'Lucy' poems with that the love lyric is to overlook their structure, in which, as in the traditional ballad, story is told as boldly and briefly as possible.... (5) comparison of, say, the first stanza She dwelt among the untrodden ways with the first stanza the traditional ballad Katharine Jaffray: There livd lass in yonder dale, And doun in yonder glen, O. And Kathrine Jaffray was her name, Well known by many men, O. and the last stanza A slumber did my spirit seal with stanza 26 of The Lass Roch Royal: O cherry, cherry was her cheek. And gowden was her hair, But clay cold were her rosey lips, Nae spark life was there. (6) demonstrates that Wordsworth follows the folk ballad in his handling rhythm, structure, and, to certain extent, theme and imagery, although he--followed by Marshak--uses variant ballad stanza: a4--b3--a4 b3. (Wordsworth bought copy Percy's Reliques Ancient English Poetry, the great repository British ballad materials, in Hamburg in 1798 few months before he started to write the poems during his and Dorothy's sojourn in Germany.) (7) Secondly, the poems are, as Carl Woodring suggests, elegies. They are elegiac in the sense sober meditation on death or subject related to and they have the economy and the general air epitaphs in the Greek Anthology.... If all elegies mitigations death, the Lucy poems also meditations on simple beauty, by distance made more sweet and by death preserved in distance. (8) side-by-side comparison poem from the Greek Anthology, the Epitaph the Singing-Girl with both stanzas A slumber did my spirit seal reveals the similarity in tone and structure the poem, ironic and spare as it is, to the Greek epitaph and thus helps to support Woodring's point: Musa the blue-eyed, the sweetly singing nightingale, Lies here suddenly mute in this little grave, Still as stone, who was once so witty, so much loved: Pretty Musa, may this dust rest lightly upon you. (9) Though one is not obliged to accept F. W. Bateson's thesis that the figure Lucy is Wordsworth's device for sublimating his incestuous feelings for his sister Dorothy, (10) it does seem likely that, as Wordsworth's editor, Ernest De Selincourt, suggests, the figure Lucy is in fact inspired by Dorothy). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGermano-SlavicaSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207