'Samuil Marshak's translations Wordsworth's "Lucy" Poems (1)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ironically, William Wordsworth (1770-1850)--the greatest English poet since Milton and one whose historical influence on language, ideas, and manners has been immense according to the respected scholar English Romanticism, Carl Woodring--has been translated to little effect ... relative to Dante, Shakespeare, Bunyan, or Dostoevsky. (2) One the relatively few translators Wordsworth has been Samuil Marshak (1887-1964), quintessential Soviet Russian man letters his time. Marshak was successful poet, translator, political satirist and state propagandist, magazine editor, and author children's books. Moreover, he was the founder the state children's publishing house, and in his moving depiction pre-revolutionary Jewish life in his memoirs he established himself as a link in the chain many generations Russian Jewry. (3) One the projects Marshak undertook as poet-translator involved four the five short lyrics Wordsworth that posterity has brought together under the rubric the poems. (These four poems appear below in Appendix A; Marshak's translations, in Cyrillic, appear in Appendix B; our back-translations Marshak's versions appear in Appendix C.) (4) It should be noted at the outset that much is lost if the reader tends to view the poems as simply traditional poems. The poems in fact, first all, as Geoffrey Durrant says, 'lyrical ballads,' each which tells verse story and presents it dramatically. To confuse the mode the 'Lucy' poems with that the love lyric is to overlook their structure, in which, as in the traditional ballad, story is told as boldly and briefly as possible.... (5) comparison of, say, the first stanza She dwelt among the untrodden ways with the first stanza the traditional ballad Katharine Jaffray: There livd lass in yonder dale, And doun in yonder glen, O. And Kathrine Jaffray was her name, Well known by many men, O. and the last stanza A slumber did my spirit seal with stanza 26 of The Lass Roch Royal: O cherry, cherry was her cheek. And gowden was her hair, But clay cold were her rosey lips, Nae spark life was there. (6) demonstrates that Wordsworth follows the folk ballad in his handling rhythm, structure, and, to certain extent, theme and imagery, although he--followed by Marshak--uses variant ballad stanza: a4--b3--a4 b3. (Wordsworth bought copy Percy's Reliques Ancient English Poetry, the great repository British ballad materials, in Hamburg in 1798 few months before he started to write the poems during his and Dorothy's sojourn in Germany.) (7) Secondly, the poems are, as Carl Woodring suggests, elegies. They are elegiac in the sense sober meditation on death or subject related to and they have the economy and the general air epitaphs in the Greek Anthology.... If all elegies mitigations death, the Lucy poems also meditations on simple beauty, by distance made more sweet and by death preserved in distance. (8) side-by-side comparison poem from the Greek Anthology, the Epitaph the Singing-Girl with both stanzas A slumber did my spirit seal reveals the similarity in tone and structure the poem, ironic and spare as it is, to the Greek epitaph and thus helps to support Woodring's point: Musa the blue-eyed, the sweetly singing nightingale, Lies here suddenly mute in this little grave, Still as stone, who was once so witty, so much loved: Pretty Musa, may this dust rest lightly upon you. (9) Though one is not obliged to accept F. W. Bateson's thesis that the figure Lucy is Wordsworth's device for sublimating his incestuous feelings for his sister Dorothy, (10) it does seem likely that, as Wordsworth's editor, Ernest De Selincourt, suggests, the figure Lucy is in fact inspired by Dorothy). …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".