MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1956101045 · doi:10.1186/s13011-015-0021-6

A scoping study of cultural interventions to treat addictions in Indigenous populations: methods, strategies and insights from a Two-Eyed Seeing approach

2015· article· en· W1956101045 on OpenAlexafffund
Margo Rowan, Nancy Poole, Beverley Shea, David Mykota, Marwa Farag, C. A. Hopkins, Laura Hall, Christopher J. Mushquash, Barbara Fornssler, Colleen Anne Dell

Bibliographic record

VenueSubstance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityImpactBritish Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's HealthLakehead UniversityBruyèreUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersHealth CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of OttawaThompson Rivers UniversityLakehead UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMontana State UniversityJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsIndigenousPsychological interventionAddictionIntervention (counseling)Focus groupPsychologyKnowledge managementApplied psychologySociologyComputer scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.235
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.212
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2350.212
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0210.018
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0050.014
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSubstance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→