PC12 cells utilize the homophilic binding site of L1 for cell−cell adhesion but L1–αvβ3 interaction for neurite outgrowth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of PC12 cells with nerve growth factor induces their differentiation into sympathetic neuron-like cells and the concomitant expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule L1, a member of the Ig superfamily. To investigate the mechanism of L1-stimulated neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells, substrate-immobilized fusion proteins containing different extracellular domains of L1 were assayed for their neuritogenic activity. Surprisingly, domain Ig2 of L1, which was previously found to contain both homophilic binding and neuritogenic activities, failed to promote neurite outgrowth. In contrast, L1-Ig6 stimulated neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells. Despite this, homotypic binding of PC12 cells was significantly inhibited by antibodies against L1-Ig2, indicating that L1-L1 binding contributed to the intercellular adhesiveness of PC12 cells, but L1-stimulated neurite outgrowth depends on heterophilic interactions. Thus, PC12 cells provide a valuable model for the study of these two distinct functions of L1. Mutagenesis of L1-Ig6 highlighted the importance of the Arg-Gly-Asp motif in this domain for neuritogenesis. Inhibition studies using cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp-containing peptide and anti-integrin antibodies suggested the involvement of alphavbeta3 integrin. Furthermore, neurite outgrowth stimulated by L1-Ig6 was inhibited by lavendustin A and the MEK inhibitor PD98059, suggesting a signaling pathway that involves tyrosine kinase activation and the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".