Multiple T-cell epitopes overlap positively-selected residues in the p1 spacer protein of HIV-1 gag
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The p1 region of HIV-1 gag contains the frameshift stem-loop, gag-pol transframe and a protease cleavage site that are crucial for viral assembly, replication and infectivity. Identifying and characterizing CD8+ epitopes that are under host immune selection in this region will help in designing effective vaccines for HIV-1. DESIGN: An approach combining bioinformatical analysis and interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays is used to identify and characterize the epitopes. Potential human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-restricted epitopes were identified by correlating the positively-selected mutations with host HLA alleles. METHODS: ELISPOT analysis with overlapping peptides was used to confirm and characterize the epitopes. RESULTS: Four positively-selected residues were significantly associated with HLA class I alleles, including HLA B*1302 (K4R, P = 0.0008 and I5L, P = 0.0108), A*7401 (S9N, P = 0.0002) and A*30 genotypes (P7S, P = 0.009), suggesting epitopes restricted by these alleles are present in this region. ELISPOT analysis with patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) identified seven novel epitopes restricted by the 3 alleles. Two types of epitopes were observed in this region based on the ELISPOT responses, Type I: the positively-selected variation does not affect CD8+ T-cell responses; and Type II: the CD8+ T-cell responses are determined by the epitope variants. CONCLUSION: We identified and characterized seven novel CD8+ epitopes in the p1 spacer protein region. Classifying the effects of positively-selected variants on CD8+ T-cell responses will help in designing effective vaccines for HIV-1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".