MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965041494 · doi:10.1139/z02-052

Genetic fragmentation of populations of the fluvial sculpin<i>Cottus nozawae</i>(Pisces: Cottidae) at the southern margin of its native range

2002· article· en· W1965041494 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tetsuhiko Yagami, Ryota Yokoyama, Akira Gotō

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSculpinCottidaeCottusBiologyRange (aeronautics)TributaryEcologyPopulationGenetic divergencePopulation fragmentationFluvialZoologyGene flowGenetic variationGenetic diversityFisheryGeographyPaleontologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of fragmentation on local genetic population structure of the fluvial sculpin Cottus nozawae was studied by comparing populations in two regions: the Tohoku District (the southern margin of the species' native range) and Hokkaido Island (the center of its native range), Japan, based on restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of mitochondrial DNA amplified by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Relatively high genetic divergences were found among populations from different regions. An analysis of molecular variance showed that Φ ST values among samples from the same river system in the Tohoku District were higher than among samples from Hokkaido Island. Heterogeneities in haplotype composition among tributary populations and among distinctive clusters were also found in the Tohoku District river system. Cottus nozawae in the Tohoku District are distributed patchily in headwater streams and may be thermally isolated. As a result, there appears to be little gene flow among tributary populations from different areas that exhibit divergence due to random genetic drift and have small effective population sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207