MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965513197 · doi:10.1063/1.2148631

Time-domain and lock-in rate-window photocarrier radiometric measurements of recombination processes in silicon

2005· article· en· W1965513197 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Mandelis, Michael Pawlak, Chinhua Wang, I. Delgadillo‐Holtfort, J. Pelzl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersRuhr-Universität BochumAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsOpticsTime domainRadiometrySuperposition principleLaserMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-domain and lock-in rate-window photocarrier radiometry (PCR) configurations are introduced both experimentally and theoretically to investigate the responses of p- and n-type Si wafers under a repetition-period-scanned square-wave-modulated super-band-gap laser beam which produces free excess photocarriers. The complete asymmetric time-domain carrier diffusion and recombination boundary-value problem with different front- and back-surface recombination velocities was solved in terms of the full spectrum of spatial eigenmodes and used to fit the time-domain data. The accurate measurement of the photocarrier transport properties (bulk lifetime, surface recombination velocities, and ambipolar diffusivity) was found to require the linear superposition of all the effective decay lifetimes associated with the eigenmode spectrum. The effects of the infinite prior pulse train to the current photocarrier radiometric response wave form were quantified and were found to be very important for certain ranges of transport parameters, pulse durations, and repetition periods. The time-domain formalism was further used to develop a theory for lock-in rate-window photocarrier radiometry. The application of the theory to the experimental results shows that they retain the time-domain character of the photocarrier generation and recombination processes, with data quality and signal-to-noise ratio superior to coaddition-averaged transients, especially in the case of samples exhibiting very low time-domain PCR signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207